|
Post by ❗ on Jun 10, 2021 12:46:58 GMT
Third Hi guys, I’m Bubida. You can refer to me as anything you want (bub, bubida, Jeff, etc) and I won’t mind. This is also my first time playing a game on the forums. I have played PS! Mafia along with other games based around social deduction though. I enjoy watching quiz shows like Jeopardy, as well as the reality TV show Survivor! Good luck guys, and make sure to have fun! bubeetle showdown has spoken. We randomly picked: crystal vote crystalban Rolled on PS We randomly picked: penmag b/Vote penmag ban#2 showdown has spoken. We randomly picked: crystal vote crystalso proof of randomisation isn't ideal because announcing that a vote is random removes your ability to pressure whoever you're voting, however mildly. It's mild, but early sl for declaring the randomisation because I feel scum is more likely to do so to feel more internally consistent dis makes sum sense actualy so proof of randomisation isn't ideal because announcing that a vote is random removes your ability to pressure whoever you're voting, however mildly. It's mild, but early sl for declaring the randomisation because I feel scum is more likely to do so to feel more internally consistent lots of logic here. Even for rvs I don't feel comfortable staying on litt atm. unvote litt[b/]
due to the badly Haunter hate Ima place my vote here for now vote newsdan[b/]Surely he cannot be this intentionally scummy as scum lots of logic here. Even for rvs I don't feel comfortable staying on litt atm. unvote litt[b/]
due to the badly Haunter hate Ima place my vote here for now vote newsdan[b/]Why would you shift off Litt if you meant your RVS in earnest? And if you actually believed Litt's logic, why shift your RVS to Newsdan? If it's not a continuation of aforementioned pointless RVS, why specifically Newsdan? yap Ah yes I finally figure out how to join welcome Honestly, I haven't gathered my thoughts up enough for a TLDR right now, and I have to go soon, sorry cya sus yeah i thought there was a rule against that vote bubeetle Okay after catching up I still have no feel for the game. This is fine. rop votepool= bubeetle, dan, or bath litt null
|
|
|
Post by erry on Jun 10, 2021 16:53:46 GMT
Sucks that we voted off Jailkeeper d1, I just got home from school so I'll need a bit to review the other messages from d1 before I can come up with more thoughts for d2
|
|
|
Post by erry on Jun 10, 2021 17:53:15 GMT
Okay, after some review, I wanna say I feel pretty good about Litt rn, I don't think they'd put themselves out there as much as they did d1 if they were maf, they were even the one who got the ball rolling for votes instead of trying to glide by d1 passively, their logic also seems pretty sound for the most part imo.
imo the people most likely to be maf rn are probably crystal, bath, or maybe edj
|
|
|
Post by erry on Jun 10, 2021 17:53:30 GMT
My main issue with edj is that they defended bath mostly off of their playstyle as well as shifting the vote to snackers last minute. I will say though that I need to get a better feel for edj still though as most of their interactions felt pretty genuine and I don't see a reason for maf to shift the vote unless news is also maf, but I feel alright about news rn
|
|
|
Post by erry on Jun 10, 2021 17:53:40 GMT
I mostly just feel off about crystal's d1 behavior, I get voting snackers for putting their vote in without much context, but a lot of people kinda lead with empty votes anyway, so it almost just feels like an excuse to bandwagon off of bubida's vote to me, also still getting a feel for crystal though since their interactions felt kind of limited d1
|
|
|
Post by erry on Jun 10, 2021 17:53:53 GMT
Bath feels like the safest vote here to me because several people have made claims against him, mostly around why he shifted his voted the other day, and I have yet to see any defense to any of those accusations from him at this point. Also, this might be seen as bandwagoning, but like I said, I feel pretty good about Litt rn and they were willing to vote on bath which makes me feel a bit more confident in that vote. If we see a solid rebuttal from bath then I might change my vote, but for now this feels like the safest option by far imo
Vote Bath[b/]
|
|
|
Post by erry on Jun 10, 2021 17:54:33 GMT
Vote Bath
I still do not understand how bolding with that bracket thing works, my bad*
|
|
|
Post by erry on Jun 10, 2021 17:56:33 GMT
do feel snackers is non-util at best heck Also this was kinda funny because of the irony
|
|
|
Post by crystal on Jun 10, 2021 19:51:23 GMT
I mostly just feel off about crystal's d1 behavior, I get voting snackers for putting their vote in without much context, but a lot of people kinda lead with empty votes anyway, so it almost just feels like an excuse to bandwagon off of bubida's vote to me, also still getting a feel for crystal though since their interactions felt kind of limited d1 Hi, I'll react quickly at your messages, especially this one since it's about me First about the lack of interactions, I try my best to share my thoughts and answer to the posts I find relevant to answer to, and unfortunately there is not a lot of discussions going on here. And i wish there were more because we don't have a lot of info rn, it's all about some very thin reactions or interactions Then for my last vote, as I said it was my only lead at the time, his behaviour was kinda weird at that time and sadly i had to go right after my post and couldn't come back before the deadline, so i miss his answer, otherwise I would have probably change my mind And regarding that I don't understand why litt and edj choose to vote for him after this and why they didn't stick to eliminate bath ps-mafia.proboards.com/post/77337/thread and about your other post on litt, I don't feel that him putting himself in the spotlight is a sure sign of being town, it could also be a cover to their maf role, and their logic is kinda discuss since d1 so for me it's not relevant either
|
|
|
Post by crystal on Jun 10, 2021 19:55:50 GMT
Also for now I agree on bath being the most suspicous, and i would rank everyone like that if I have to :
Bath>litt>edj>news>other people idk about>bubida/erry/gimmick/!
The left most position being the most likely to be maf for me
Anyways I don't wanna vote today for bath as there are enough vote and I don't want to be accuse of wagoning once again, so I'll think about it tmrw and cast my vote at that time regarding any answers (I hope) on this thread
|
|
|
Post by crystal on Jun 10, 2021 19:58:01 GMT
Plus rip for Franco, he was kinda the only person I really trusted to be town even after his randvote on me lol
|
|
|
Post by Edjeanerations on Jun 10, 2021 20:11:56 GMT
My main issue with edj is that they defended bath mostly off of their playstyle as well as shifting the vote to snackers last minute. I will say though that I need to get a better feel for edj still though as most of their interactions felt pretty genuine and I don't see a reason for maf to shift the vote unless news is also maf, but I feel alright about news rn Alright first of all defending someone you know based off their playstyle shouldn't be seen as scummy, I know playermeta isn't always a good thing but it is something that people use a lot when they have played enough with a person. Second of all I already explained why I wanted plurality shifted off of newsdan, which is the reason I got at least litt to shift to snackers with me. If you read eod you'll be able to see that post
|
|
|
Post by Edjeanerations on Jun 10, 2021 20:13:09 GMT
I'm not just going to sit here and defend bath forever though, bathsplishsploosh I would like to hear from you now. Can you give thoughts on at least some of the players or what you thought about eod?
|
|
|
Post by Edjeanerations on Jun 10, 2021 20:15:33 GMT
I mostly just feel off about crystal's d1 behavior, I get voting snackers for putting their vote in without much context, but a lot of people kinda lead with empty votes anyway, so it almost just feels like an excuse to bandwagon off of bubida's vote to me, also still getting a feel for crystal though since their interactions felt kind of limited d1 Hi, I'll react quickly at your messages, especially this one since it's about me First about the lack of interactions, I try my best to share my thoughts and answer to the posts I find relevant to answer to, and unfortunately there is not a lot of discussions going on here. And i wish there were more because we don't have a lot of info rn, it's all about some very thin reactions or interactions Then for my last vote, as I said it was my only lead at the time, his behaviour was kinda weird at that time and sadly i had to go right after my post and couldn't come back before the deadline, so i miss his answer, otherwise I would have probably change my mind And regarding that I don't understand why litt and edj choose to vote for him after this and why they didn't stick to eliminate bathps-mafia.proboards.com/post/77337/thread and about your other post on litt, I don't feel that him putting himself in the spotlight is a sure sign of being town, it could also be a cover to their maf role, and their logic is kinda discuss since d1 so for me it's not relevant either Re: bold I think you misread something because yesterday bath was the only one besides Dan I said I felt decent about, plus I was on franco and switched to snackers, and litt was on Dan. Neither of us were trying to eliminate bath in the first place
|
|
|
Post by NewsDan on Jun 10, 2021 20:25:05 GMT
Okay, after some review, I wanna say I feel pretty good about Litt rn, I don't think they'd put themselves out there as much as they did d1 if they were maf, they were even the one who got the ball rolling for votes instead of trying to glide by d1 passivel This is what I was saying yday (minus the good logic stuff). Reading up now but the lurkers are lurkin'. Feel pretty towny about litt and edj rn
|
|
|
Post by crystal on Jun 10, 2021 20:29:02 GMT
Hi, I'll react quickly at your messages, especially this one since it's about me First about the lack of interactions, I try my best to share my thoughts and answer to the posts I find relevant to answer to, and unfortunately there is not a lot of discussions going on here. And i wish there were more because we don't have a lot of info rn, it's all about some very thin reactions or interactions Then for my last vote, as I said it was my only lead at the time, his behaviour was kinda weird at that time and sadly i had to go right after my post and couldn't come back before the deadline, so i miss his answer, otherwise I would have probably change my mind And regarding that I don't understand why litt and edj choose to vote for him after this and why they didn't stick to eliminate bathps-mafia.proboards.com/post/77337/thread and about your other post on litt, I don't feel that him putting himself in the spotlight is a sure sign of being town, it could also be a cover to their maf role, and their logic is kinda discuss since d1 so for me it's not relevant either Re: bold I think you misread something because yesterday bath was the only one besides Dan I said I felt decent about, plus I was on franco and switched to snackers, and litt was on Dan. Neither of us were trying to eliminate bath in the first place yeah sorry mb I was not very clear my point was more on why did you chose at the end to vote snacker after he explained the point I mentionned (regarding his vote) I meant that we were talking about bath a lot at the same time, I know that it wasn't specifically your "target" but at the time of the deadline he was way more suspicious than snackers, because bath never answer any post talking about him
|
|
|
Post by NewsDan on Jun 10, 2021 21:02:10 GMT
So Bath has been a bit off, but he also plays aggressively normally, and tbh I'm not too thrown off by him sussing me after what Litt said- it made sense bc Litt was saying I was disingenuous, the post implicated me as much as Litts original target. Hard null rn on bathboi
|
|
|
Post by NewsDan on Jun 10, 2021 21:04:33 GMT
! Boi read thru a lot but didn't really form original reads from it. And those reads were honestly just exaggerated versions of what other people put. For now, vote !
|
|
|
Post by Animal Midwife on Jun 10, 2021 21:20:09 GMT
I'm still feeling okay with my vote from yesterday, but glad to see the game's more awake now.
Vote edj
|
|
|
Post by Edjeanerations on Jun 10, 2021 21:46:04 GMT
Re: bold I think you misread something because yesterday bath was the only one besides Dan I said I felt decent about, plus I was on franco and switched to snackers, and litt was on Dan. Neither of us were trying to eliminate bath in the first place yeah sorry mb I was not very clear my point was more on why did you chose at the end to vote snacker after he explained the point I mentionned (regarding his vote) I meant that we were talking about bath a lot at the same time, I know that it wasn't specifically your "target" but at the time of the deadline he was way more suspicious than snackers, because bath never answer any post talking about himWell if I'm being completely honest the reason I switched to snackers was because it was like 10 minutes before dl and with my vote we only needed one more to secure plurality. I didn't really scumread him but I townread Dan more than I scumread anyone specifically so I went for the easiest shift. Re: bold I'm going to go back and analyze eod because I actually didn't realize this? Thx for pointing it out
|
|
|
Post by Edjeanerations on Jun 10, 2021 21:47:35 GMT
I'm still feeling okay with my vote from yesterday, but glad to see the game's more awake now. Vote edjI understood yesterday's vote because of rvs but why the vote today?
|
|
|
Post by Edjeanerations on Jun 10, 2021 21:50:16 GMT
huh wait why is iso not working
|
|
|
Post by ForgotToFlush on Jun 10, 2021 23:09:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by bubidajeffery on Jun 11, 2021 2:05:02 GMT
I agree that litt is pretty townie for making pretty bold statements and not being afraid to vocalize reads and how he feels about things
As for scum I’m not really sure right now
|
|
|
Post by ❗ on Jun 11, 2021 2:06:19 GMT
first i want to say that i misread the thing and thought u all wrote 10 pages for a sec so this was a pleasant surprise
|
|