|
|
Post by kliff on Jul 4, 2022 23:58:36 GMT
These two post giving me scum vibes. Vote chaostrodonHere a Hot take of mine: pacncheese probably fits the Archetype of a typical town with unpopular opinions / prone to Mis-voting. What are your thoughts on it. Could this be !Scum Chaos Fearing my Vibe indicator. |
|
|
|
Post by kliff on Jul 5, 2022 0:02:23 GMT
Also as for the ohsnapa shift I never pushed it or actively pursued it. I switched to nv cuz it seemed to me the best call since at that time I had no debatable cases on anyone other than pmeta and wanted to deal with it genuinely after the n1 results come and post my analysis based on that. But all the same I would explain why I hadn't given any reads too, when the game started 4 people were active when I saw the announcement ohsnapa, mib, sylv and spor, the rvs call by sylv, getting on me traversing through all the other 3 ACTIVE players in less than an hour or so made me doubt they were aligned with any of them and cyan and erry coming and cooling things down made em seem towny and atm my reads would have been nothing but pmeta and other is sus, like sylv was doing, so yeh nothing of contribution could have been formed off them so I thought the most help I could give atm was by proposing ideas or scenarios. Thought all the same ohsnapa gave up shitposting and seems genuinely contributed which makes em a tr for me, cyan giving off townleading vibes with his consistent aid and requesting others to form paragraphs etc (this contradicts with my above statement of cyan ik, but I wanna be sure they aren't pulling a 1000iq play they are smart as mafia), erry idk, MIM has been trying and sylv has been doing nothing but pursuing people as individuals and forming arguments based off their certain playstyle though that one line about shiftvoting despite they have deviated from it lol, makes me wanna tr em. I can't quite form reads on others I haven't seen em in ps so it is weird and new. The rest is that I am hesitant to post my reads on people cuz ik they impact alot for the X person in the read and might change the scenario of the game if they are scum or town and opposite to what I posted about them, so yeh trying to play safe. agreed btw, I had to c/p into google docs and add spacing |
|
|
|
Post by zachattack01 on Jul 5, 2022 0:06:25 GMT
mmib is just, dude i dont know what to say about mmib honestly, but what I do know is that mmib is very consistent.mmib knows that I tr them, which isn't normal, which he knows but despite this fact, they never change their tone even by a bit when continuing to speak. each line possesses the same aura and confidence, which is what a townie would do. Even if a scum member would be confident like a townie that would be very hard to pull off and would personally require tremendous skill.
I think it's very important to bring attention to this observation of mmib because it rings even truer after mmib's sus of chaos. In the time since they were thought of as consensus town on around page 6/7, it seems that mmib has used that to their advantage to aggressively push people that either a good number of people were somewhat suspicious of or just saying blatantly dumb things, that being sylv and shadow on forum page 10. Something didn't sit right with me about mmib's responses, but I couldn't figure out why, so I didn't pay much attention to it. The only thing I really conclusively felt was weird were the lengths mmib was going to try and sus out those two. It felt different from other aggressions made by town members.
They went even further with this after, but they were mainly responses to sylv. Not really much to be concluded there. That was, until they started talking with chaos. I like another one of snap's assessments, this one being of chaos. Snap's biggest point is that chaos's progression feels natural. They also claims that that wasn't indicative of alignment, which I agree that it isn't. I think both alignments have reasons to either be quiet, passive, or concise on Day 1. Overly aggressive play by anyone could get them either voted out day 1 or killed by mafia night 1, not something that either alignment wants to have happen to them.
Since that's the case mmib, why are you sus of chaos?
Why? Is that message suspicious? Also, what happened to you're "Don't keep it brief" mentality? i already explained why imo it was suspicious a bit ago, but regardless and simply put this just looks like "who is the funniest" reads or smthn. i dont see any good logic or actual logic as to voting spore from this also breifness isnt what you should go for.. its better to put a lot of refined info into one post rather than a small amount of brief info or a lot of bits of short info If I'm understanding correctly, this is why you're sus of chaos. It's a lack of "refined info" in their posts, right? This type of assessment is very easy to do. You divide people and make conclusions about them based on the quantity of their content, not the quality. It's very surface level. Chaos's statements have not only seemed very natural but show an solid understanding of the state of the game.
The aggression and attacking style looks similar , would be a stretch to pursue based on that , just making a note for myself later
this has to be the laziest elaboration i have seen... this is why im starting to sr chaos they have been making these one-line "read" posts, which are just so seemingly basic and really not showing much use of evidence or info. also the elaboration i am currently responding to seems to just be them trying to be careful in getting called out by zach a lot of chaos's posts are just so basic, and im not seeing any solid reads or getting anything townie from them. the way they just seem to coast/filler in their posts and go on with the game is telling me theyre scum Don't act like you're assessments of chaos aren't lazy just because you're using more words than they are. While the way you're approaching chaos is consistent with what the way you've approached sylv and shadow, I think this is where you've gone a bit too far. It almost seems like you're trying too hard to stay as town in the public's perception since people read you as such earlier. No one is really doubting that, so why are you trying so hard to stay so consistent? I don't think someone who is town would necessarily do this. I don't scum you because of your consistency, but I absolutely cannot town read you for recently lazy approaches under the guise of consistency. I'm keeping an eye on you. If you wanna be convincing in your accusations of chaos, then I think you need a little more than just, they haven't said much when they have plenty of opportunity to do so.
I dont do over-explainy redundant posts with multiple paras on d1.
If you want to see me do that , you have to wait a bit until late game
I would recommend not judging people by the length of their posts however , that can lead to a lot of disappointment |
|
|
|
Post by kliff on Jul 5, 2022 0:51:53 GMT
The aggression and attacking style looks similar , would be a stretch to pursue based on that , just making a note for myself later
this has to be the laziest elaboration i have seen... this is why im starting to sr chaos they have been making these one-line "read" posts, which are just so seemingly basic and really not showing much use of evidence or info. also the elaboration i am currently responding to seems to just be them trying to be careful in getting called out by zach
a lot of chaos's posts are just so basic, and im not seeing any solid reads or getting anything townie from them . the way they just seem to coast/filler in their posts and go on with the game is telling me theyre scum Would recommend retuning your vibes indicator
with what i have been pushing on chaos this only proves my point more. the whole "my stuff got deleted whooops" and then making reads based off of feelings from one post just seems like a convenient excuse to not post reads and act like you actually have reasoning behind ur srs also there is most likely some sort of undo button or some shit so i really dislike that excuse since chaos isnt under any actual pressure i just think he feels like he doesnt need a good defense, but i think thats a stretch I dont think spore really meant that , and even if he did , why cant the first 3 people who talk be scum? Also no way does simply saying something improbable deserve a vote.
Secondly , just because someone trs you doesnt mean they should be voting with you , you are confusing tring and sheeping gen z has nothing to do with mafia but ok im sorry but i dont see a clear explanation of the "lapses in logic". also when did spore get into that convo? anyway i feel like that post just explains basic terms rather than explaining the lapses also the 1st 3 people online could of course have scum in it (not me dawg im town) but rn other people are scummier due to their posts, reasoning, or logic (like you) anyway idk who u meant when u said "no way does simply saying something improbable deserve a vote" but its more likely that that person had multiple posts or is consistently doing something that doesnt make sense (i feel like ur talking about pac). if ur talking about sylv then they most definitely have said more than a couple improbable things I think these series of post is just a Overthinking Moment for mymemoryisbad. This is something I should look into at another time but, for now Ill have this thought documented here. |
|
|
|
Post by mymemoryisbad on Jul 5, 2022 1:42:56 GMT
Yeah, I think with the wagon off of sylv now, they were either panicky town kinda desperate for an sr that was cw-able. if pac flips town i really think we vote sylv next day. the feel im overall getting is p similar to kliffs thoughts on pac, in the fact that pac is really just sealing his own fate. if sylv is scum then the pac cw could just be voting make-no-sense townie
|
|
|
|
Post by cyan on Jul 5, 2022 2:01:41 GMT
still not seeing anything of note from pac, they're kinda just doubling down on everything they said. and also i have no clue if it's a normal thing for town to withhold reads so as to not trigger flags in other players. i certainly don't think it's a consideration in the early game. speaking of withholding reads or some shit, i have another read on you but i cant be fucking bothered to quote anything old so imma just ok earlier we had an interaction where i was asking you "what the fuck are those replies" and at the end of that you said "let us end this conversation then lol" or some shit along those lines you see that triggered my spidey tingly sensies. after that, like, after a few lines, you said "i might be digging my own grave here" then you yadayada gave more reads. i'd just like to call out that. - you realized you were digging your own grave by asking me those questions that werent actually proper replies, - you insisted we stop talking about it. i pay it no attention because i cant be wasting my fucking time - after that you "dig" your own grave INTENTIONALLY so why the fuck did you stop digging your grave accidentally only to dig your grave intentionally later on like you realized you were being fucked, but then you didnt realize how fucked you were, so after the moment passed you just, you, like, lmao, like you just decided to fuck yourself over, by deciding, like, dude i cant even fucking type this sentence without laughing but i hope you get the point mainly because i prefer to have control over when and where i fuck up. helps me get my points across. i contradict my playstyle whenever i feel like it in order to make sure my points (and yours, in this case) get through to everyone else as cleanly as possible. i was explaining your case on me because i needed to explain it in clear words to spore who was on track to accidentally misrepresent your case on me as a tonal read call me a prophet because i speak nothing but the truth I'm not gonna bother writing out an actual case against Pac, there's plenty of those already going around. Instead, I'd like to point out a few interactions between our two current wagons, Pac and Sylv. As far as I'm aware, the only person who has a different username than on PS is spore, but it's super obvious who he is. Idk who erry is though. What the hell does ftr mean? And you vote snapa when I currently was voting spore?!?! This makes no sense. Okay, pac is also suspicious. IDK who to trust here As far as I'm concerned the first two messages here are meaningless and just serve to make it look like you had more to say about Pac, leading up to you saying they're suspicious, than you actually have. As for the final message, I'm quite confused as to why Pac voting Snapa while Slyv was on Spore makes any difference here, yet that's the sole evidence presented in this post before leading up to the conclusion that Pac is suspicious. The post almost comes across as if Slyv was expecting Pac to follow their vote. The ending line sticks out a lot to me though, the phrasing "Okay, pac is also suspicious" is phrased as if Pac is only just now being tacked on to their sus list, while the following line "IDK who to trust here" additionally implies that they must've had some trust in Pac to begin with. Assuming this is the case, this feels like such a weird pivot of suspicion to go from, at least mildy, trusting someone to suddenly making a post against them (one with no evidence to even justify it as well, as previously mentioned). i'm willing to bet that you are instead looking at a case of sylveon skimming through the game and writing out whatever came to mind in the quick reply box. but then again, hanlon's razor isn't bulletproofThis feels like a lazy attempt at helping bolster a wagon other than the one on Slyv themselves so they can be relieved of a bit of pressure. +1. if we're talking about pac's wagon, sylv generally has barked louder than he's bitten. he wants pac out in a way that feels very much like a half-baked attempt to deflect.After this, Sylv went on a war path against Pac, however, Pac's only reply to these posts sounds very calm, largely just discussing the specifics of the strategy they had proposed early in the game rather than actually fighting back: I meant that the mafia rb would be contradicting the mafia through out the game in day (chat) smh not just on the kill which is why I asked them to clear cyan, for me they are capable of suggesting this or being the mafia rb'er themselves. But that is again pmeta. They would avoid as many interaction with the rb'er person cuz it is literally their hugest asset, having em linked with any of the mafia goons would be dumb and if they can't rb cop or other pr's it would heavily impact their chances to win. As far as the night action talk goes, yes I should have revisited you raised a valid point which I overlooked though I would just like to bring "assume the townie we demanded got cleared as a townie" to light as a rule for town so we cannot demand cop claims d2 just to clear a townie or so and bring attention to potential cop. The latter on you saying they will get killed then let me rephrase it cop gets to know the exact role so we can cop someone till we get the mafia rb'er though getting a consensus on who has to be the one who gets copped or checked will help alot so we can keep track of who could have been or could have not been mafia goons. And if they try to kill em again a conf townie they are gonna waste a nk. You can extract whatever you want from this but yeh. Also if, hypothetically, I am a mafia then where are and who are my partners? Pac's following message largely explained their thoughts on each of the players: Also as for the ohsnapa shift I never pushed it or actively pursued it. I switched to nv cuz it seemed to me the best call since at that time I had no debatable cases on anyone other than pmeta and wanted to deal with it genuinely after the n1 results come and post my analysis based on that. But all the same I would explain why I hadn't given any reads too, when the game started 4 people were active when I saw the announcement ohsnapa, mib, sylv and spor, the rvs call by sylv, getting on me traversing through all the other 3 ACTIVE players in less than an hour or so made me doubt they were aligned with any of them and cyan and erry coming and cooling things down made em seem towny and atm my reads would have been nothing but pmeta and other is sus, like sylv was doing, so yeh nothing of contribution could have been formed off them so I thought the most help I could give atm was by proposing ideas or scenarios. Thought all the same ohsnapa gave up shitposting and seems genuinely contributed which makes em a tr for me, cyan giving off townleading vibes with his consistent aid and requesting others to form paragraphs etc (this contradicts with my above statement of cyan ik, but I wanna be sure they aren't pulling a 1000iq play they are smart as mafia), erry idk, MIM has been trying and sylv has been doing nothing but pursuing people as individuals and forming arguments based off their certain playstyle though that one line about shiftvoting despite they have deviated from it lol, makes me wanna tr em. I can't quite form reads on others I haven't seen em in ps so it is weird and new. The rest is that I am hesitant to post my reads on people cuz ik they impact alot for the X person in the read and might change the scenario of the game if they are scum or town and opposite to what I posted about them, so yeh trying to play safe. What I find really interesting about this is their analysis of Sylv, "sylv has been doing nothing but pursuing people as individuals and forming arguments based off their certain playstyle though that one line about shiftvoting despite they have deviated from it lol, makes me wanna tr em." The logic here makes absolutely no sense to me, most of the posts where Sylv has been "pursuing people as individuals" they've literally just been saying the most surface level things (not even actually related to the game) such as consistently correcting people's grammar instead of forming real reads. can we also note that "doing nothing but pursuing people as individuals and forming arguments based off their certain playstyle" isn't even town-AI behaviour? your attempt to dissect it has not helped me understand pac or their intentions in any wayAfter the "positives" of Sylv they also listed a negative, but I find it interesting that the negative they listed was just that they didn't stick to their guns about shiftvoting despite there being literally pages of people talking about negatives and suspicious activity related to Sylv. It honestly feels like they wanted to find a reason to TR Sylv, but just couldn't so they tried to make them sound better than they actually were and used it as justification for their town read. At this point I'm beginning to believe that Slyv pushing Pac so hard is done for two reasons, firstly to help alleviate pressure on themselves, but also to make it very clear that Sylv is strongly against Pac, which would also explain very blatantly bold lines such as "More info about the Pac n cheese bandwagon. Let's make this an official wagon, guys!" that honestly just stick out like a sore thumb. *Conclusions* As for why they'd want to make it abhorrently clear that they're against Pac, I'm inclined to believe its because they may be a scum team and since both of them were being pushed here (with good odds that one of them gets voted off) it could very well help save face for the other if people believe they're not connected. Looking at Pac's side of things, if we do assume that Pac is scum here, then we know that they attempted to align themselves with 6 "town," however, if they really are scum then the idea that all 6 of those players really are town feels a bit farfetched to me. It makes much more sense for them to propose a plan like that if they had at least one other scum in the 6 to help back them up, additionally, the way they phrased it feels like a bad attempt at trying to clear everyone in that group, in a sense (which could imply an attempt at clearing a partner as well). One of the 6 in question was Slyv. Going back to their interactions with them, they largely glanced over Sylv hard-pushing them as if not actually worried about it and then proceeded to list some half-baked reasons as to why they believe Sylv is town. It really feels like they're trying to avoid extra suspicion on Sylv by not fighting back and also giving them that TR. tldr; I believe its entirely possible that Slyv and Pac could be a scum team here. I'm going to Vote Pac here, regardless of how this flips I believe we gain a ton of information out of it based on the interactions so far. if you want to take this a step further, i think it wouldn't be a stretch to say that sylv is the maf rb given these interactions. following your train of thought, sylv wants attention off themselves and onto pac, while pac doesn't mind - i doubt two goons would behave this way, so we've really got to work with the fact that either they're incompatible or sylv is rb.
then again, this is your train of thought (or at least my interpretation of it). i'd like to know why you've decided to vote pac in this situation.
personally i still think we should treat sylv v. pac as svt because while you could make an argument for them having a common goal, their utter lack of coherence is just not something a mafia team as a whole would've approved of. why would sylv deflect attention onto a partner in the first place, unless sylv was rb? and are we sure sylv is rb?aight so like, not rlly in the mood to do this shit rn, but i feel like sylv is using a lot of appeal to emotion their lines use a lot of passive aggressive yet this kind of uhhhhhhh, fuck how do i describe it. it's like you want to give them pity because of how they're sounding, like, you can tell they're very nervous right now, their lines display out of place tones. this is noticeable in some cases You say I'm trying to sound nervous, but you're also saying "uhhh, how do I describe it" like you've been forced to talk in front of a classroom full of kids, with no script ready. Sounds like hypocrisy!
there's a massive difference between being emotional and appealing to emotion. it feels like snap is just typing things out in a way that emulates conversational language (as he tends to do in realtime chat mafia) as opposed to the calculated and direct style of forum play.
and like
this is his first game
you are literally trying to push someone for communicating in a human manner
that is not how AtE works
for example, - they put exclamation marks in places that probably shouldnt be there - for example, making comments about doing fish - commenting about how stressful forums is - and other shit like that Snapa, that's me being energetic. You're projecting.
and are we going to talk about the time you pushed snap for being "uuuuhhhhh idk" over all you would think these are really simple lines and shouldn't be looked into but the more you see more of these lines the more you'll realize that these lines are very very very off putting. like, it makes you ask why the fuck they exist, like, why are they saying these lines, i cant say they're filler because filler is less useful than these, if anything they're very weird reactionsWhy did it take you so much words just to say "These lines are weird IMO" Oh, I know! You're trying to sound nervous!!! Btw, I only made three of these lines!!!!! This is over exaggeration.it's one of those lines that you will give a null read about at first glance, but when you actually start reading them, it gives you this gut feeling that you're unable to describe them. - they also make uhhhhhhhhh, fuck what's it called, they make lines that are out of character or out of place, you know? like More obvious emotional appeal. This is starting to seem like padding. - i mean it's not really in character of sylveon to say shit like "oh let's go see blah blah blah" or some other shit Neither is it in character of you. I'm just adapting to forum mafia's longer day talk and more information in each read.dude, i dont fucking know how to describe sylveon 100% analytically but tldr; they're just very off putting, their lines are so out of place, but I know for a fact that Sylveon isn't calm. Sylveon is either nervous or panicky, they're not panicking, but they're panicky. That's in PS Mafia, where we don't have 2 entire days worth of daytime. Also, we can see lines as they're being sent on Showdown.
mmib is just, dude i dont know what to say about mmib honestly, but what I do know is that mmib is very consistent.Again, the green text is just annoying. Also, you could just remove the non green text, and you'd still get the same effect.mmib knows that I tr them, which isn't normal, which he knows but despite this fact, they never change their tone even by a bit when continuing to speak. each line possesses the same aura and confidence, which is what a townie would do. Even if a scum member would be confident like a townie that would be very hard to pull off and would personally require tremendous skill. This is heavily based on who's confident. Well, in your eyes. Your eyes that can't tell the difference between nervousness and energeticness.right now i think mmib is just the towniest here, along with erry, but i havent kept up with reading erry You're padding this claim by talking about erry for a second. I'm gonna need to make a version where I take out all the padding and boil it down to the most fundamental concepts.i know for a fact that some people are sussing out mmib for some reason, but this just proves my point even further despite mmib being thought suspiscious of, they still remain in their consistent posture. This is bullshit. Nobody's suspicious about him here.there is one flaw about this explanation though, it's that mmib was inconsistent, but i only found one inconsistency it was when they said they were going to sleep, came back and read my line about this whole fucking, like, ohsnapa's scale, or some shit, then kept using the scale as a means of displaying reads, I argee, that's inconsistent. What's also inconsistent is you refering to yourself in the third person.other than that i think they're fairly townieSnapa's text might look normal now, but from this point on in the original post, the text was black. This was definitely not on accident either.i think my most interesting read in this segment: One of Zach and Shadow are scum / both are highly likely to not be alignedThis is the most normal read, actually. Less padding, and actually decent points. I don't have the time to cover it rn, however. I need a break.Zach's first few lines are particularly aggressive. Not really aggressive, only particularly. This doesn't always indicate townie behavior. But in the case of Zach, it's simply different. Zach's read on Pac caught my attention, not because of their read particularly, but by the tone and method of their reading. It's clear that Zach's approach to reading Pac was aggressive. Personally, put simply, a scum member would not start their approach of D1 like Zach would do. (But I may be wrong, but I'm inclined to believe that Zach is towny here simply because of their tone and attacking style). Personally, a scum member would start their day off by being calm and collected. This isn't always the case, but take a look at Shadow's lines. On the side of shadoweavile, we see them approach D1 as calmly as possible, which is fine by town's standard, this doesn't necessarily mean that Shadow is scum. But if we take a look at town's whole aura right now, it's fairly tense. In conclusion, Shadow's the exact opposite of what Zach is, and this doesn't tell us that one of them is scum, but by looking at the whole interaction between all members of town, and with the aura of town, I can say that not only was Shadow's reads very lacking and lazily written, I can also conclude that they're very scummy in comparison to Zach. But this could be applied in the reverse as well. Zach could be scum for having an aggressive starting approach to D1, while Shadow can be a town member having a calm approach to D1. If anything, I would want to see shadow and Zach play more, and see if they're both consistent with their tones and reads. Overall: One of Zach and Shadow are scum. Leaning Shadow as scummy between them. this read really feels like something i pulled out of my fucking ass but i really think shadow is scummy for their tones and overall aura when paired with town. They're not with the town when we look at it from a playing style approach.
zach is very much with town if we look at it from a playing style approachAs always, comments are in purple! Gonna work on the trimmed down version. so uh. save for the bit about zach v. shadow, i seriously feel like this one post is sylv trying to antagonize snap by making them sound evil without really going into any detail as to what makes snap's style of communication scummy. i mean i'm actually even more inclined to townread snap now because this response has negative merit tl;dr sylv v pac is best thought of at least svt. sylv v snap is best thought of as likely svt. i'm giving sylveon one whole day of breathing room before his ass gets hunted to death. use it wisely. |
|
|
|
Post by cyan on Jul 5, 2022 2:02:36 GMT
botched formatting but whatever.
|
|
|
|
Post by zachattack01 on Jul 5, 2022 2:13:29 GMT
so uh. save for the bit about zach v. shadow, i seriously feel like this one post is sylv trying to antagonize snap by making them sound evil without really going into any detail as to what makes snap's style of communication scummy. i mean i'm actually even more inclined to townread snap now because this response has negative merit
tl;dr sylv v pac is best thought of at least svt. sylv v snap is best thought of as likely svt.
i'm giving sylveon one whole day of breathing room before his ass gets hunted to death. use it wisely. other than sylv pursing pac to try and get the pressure on them and that a scum pair wouldn't do that, is there any reasoning behind your assumption that sylv and pac are svt.? i have a hard time believing either could possibly be town based on anything they've said |
|
|
|
Post by cyan on Jul 5, 2022 2:24:11 GMT
i mean if we had a ww i'd call the interactions between them maf v. ww. it's just that both are playing anti-town, but if we take that to mean that both aren't town, they're also most likely playing anti-scum
only scenario where this doesn't count is if sylv is maf rb
|
|
|
|
Post by zachattack01 on Jul 5, 2022 2:26:50 GMT
makes sense
|
|
|
|
Post by micromorphic on Jul 5, 2022 2:30:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by micromorphic on Jul 5, 2022 2:34:59 GMT
 Time has elapsed. pacncheese was voted. They were a Security Guard (Bodyguard).It is now Night 1! Night 1 will end at 10:30PM EST, or around 24 hours from this post. |
|
|
|
Post by micromorphic on Jul 5, 2022 21:13:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by micromorphic on Jul 6, 2022 23:36:25 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by micromorphic on Jul 7, 2022 2:19:10 GMT
erry has died. They were a Party Guest (Vanilla Townie)
|
|
|
|
Post by micromorphic on Jul 7, 2022 2:30:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by zachattack01 on Jul 7, 2022 2:31:03 GMT
vote sylveon & rando
|
|
|
|
Post by mymemoryisbad on Jul 7, 2022 2:31:31 GMT
well were back at it again it seems
|
|
|
|
Post by mymemoryisbad on Jul 7, 2022 2:32:37 GMT
i would like to see what the subs have to bring, also i feel bad considering how much they have to read. still dont like chaos. vote chaos
|
|
|
|
Post by chaostrodon on Jul 7, 2022 2:41:26 GMT
I feel sad about pac , In retrospect , should have noticed talking about bg randomly was odd. I would want to get a feel of everyone in the game today
So, vote Litteleven[\b[
|
|
|
|
Post by cyan on Jul 7, 2022 2:51:26 GMT
fuck pac all my homies hate pac I feel sad about pac , In retrospect , should have noticed talking about bg randomly was odd. I would want to get a feel of everyone in the game today So, vote Litteleven[\b[you had all of yesterday to get a feel of the game. this comment is hilariously low-effort and after the chaos that was d1 i'd expect at least one read from you that you're pursuing. please try harder. anyways, i keep my promises Vote Sylveon & Randoyou, sir, have much to explain. |
|
Sylveon & Rando
Innocent Child
"No! You can't just meme about how much you have posted!" "Haha VT go brrrrrr"
Posts: 75 
|
Post by Sylveon & Rando on Jul 7, 2022 2:52:05 GMT
chaostrodon it's in the format "Vote: [Player"
|
|
Sylveon & Rando
Innocent Child
"No! You can't just meme about how much you have posted!" "Haha VT go brrrrrr"
Posts: 75
|
Post by Sylveon & Rando on Jul 7, 2022 2:54:54 GMT
fuck pac all my homies hate pac I feel sad about pac , In retrospect , should have noticed talking about bg randomly was odd. I would want to get a feel of everyone in the game today So, vote Litteleven[\b[you had all of yesterday to get a feel of the game. this comment is hilariously low-effort and after the chaos that was d1 i'd expect at least one read from you that you're pursuing. please try harder. anyways, i keep my promises Vote Sylveon & Randoyou, sir, have much to explain. You also have much to explain. Specifically: What I need to explain. |
|
|
|
Post by zachattack01 on Jul 7, 2022 2:58:38 GMT
It’s kinda obvious. You were just throwing out random reads and then went done hard on pac after people starting pressing him. Why did you do that? And be thorough please
|
|
Sylveon & Rando
Innocent Child
"No! You can't just meme about how much you have posted!" "Haha VT go brrrrrr"
Posts: 75
|
Post by Sylveon & Rando on Jul 7, 2022 3:00:45 GMT
[Kliff quote]
Would recommend retuning your vibes indicator Could this be !Scum Chaos Fearing my Vibe indicator. Okay, this is stupid. Chaos had every reason to be suspicious of Pac. It was explained why what he said was scummy, even if foresight is 2020. |
|
