|
|
Post by ohsnapa on Jul 4, 2022 14:54:27 GMT
has chaostrodon given actual reads or are they giving similar vibes to shadow.
like if we were to use a scale on how similar chaos and shadow are
0 is null
10 is most calm and collected
honestly i think shadow is calmer than chaos
shadow would be a 7 in the calmness levels
chaos would be near a 5 or a 6
comparing the two's playstyles would indicate that they're scum but i doubt that's the case.
chaos has been progressive in terms of lines, they didnt give out a full read on their first 5 lines, instead they're making notes and some other filler stuff, which is more natural than shadow
this explains why shadow is scummy too. Shadow doesnt have a natural progression, while chaos does
chaos and shadow could be aligned, but i doubt that's the case at all
also, even though chaos is similar to shadow's vibe, they are not comparable to zach because of their natural progression
both shadow and zach tackle the game immediately, zach after their first post, shadow after their 2nd (or 3rd?), once again, chaos has natural progression.
their lines give semi-null vibes as of now, it's either a -1 or a 1 on the scale, i am leaning -1.
|
|
|
|
Post by cyan on Jul 4, 2022 15:04:09 GMT
still not seeing anything of note from pac, they're kinda just doubling down on everything they said.
and also i have no clue if it's a normal thing for town to withhold reads so as to not trigger flags in other players. i certainly don't think it's a consideration in the early game.
|
|
|
|
Post by ohsnapa on Jul 4, 2022 15:14:42 GMT
still not seeing anything of note from pac, they're kinda just doubling down on everything they said. and also i have no clue if it's a normal thing for town to withhold reads so as to not trigger flags in other players. i certainly don't think it's a consideration in the early game. speaking of withholding reads or some shit, i have another read on you but i cant be fucking bothered to quote anything old so imma just ok earlier we had an interaction where i was asking you "what the fuck are those replies" and at the end of that you said "let us end this conversation then lol" or some shit along those lines you see that triggered my spidey tingly sensies. after that, like, after a few lines, you said "i might be digging my own grave here" then you yadayada gave more reads. i'd just like to call out that. - you realized you were digging your own grave by asking me those questions that werent actually proper replies, - you insisted we stop talking about it. i pay it no attention because i cant be wasting my fucking time - after that you "dig" your own grave INTENTIONALLY so why the fuck did you stop digging your grave accidentally only to dig your grave intentionally later on like you realized you were being fucked, but then you didnt realize how fucked you were, so after the moment passed you just, you, like, lmao, like you just decided to fuck yourself over, by deciding, like, dude i cant even fucking type this sentence without laughing but i hope you get the point |
|
|
|
Post by ohsnapa on Jul 4, 2022 15:16:40 GMT
also cyan i have a question
|
|
|
|
Post by erry on Jul 4, 2022 17:01:54 GMT
I'm not gonna bother writing out an actual case against Pac, there's plenty of those already going around. Instead, I'd like to point out a few interactions between our two current wagons, Pac and Sylv. also may ik which user is which? cuz I think some peeps forum names differ from their ps names As far as I'm aware, the only person who has a different username than on PS is spore, but it's super obvious who he is. Idk who erry is though. What the hell does ftr mean? And you vote snapa when I currently was voting spore?!?! This makes no sense. Okay, pac is also suspicious. IDK who to trust here As far as I'm concerned the first two messages here are meaningless and just serve to make it look like you had more to say about Pac, leading up to you saying they're suspicious, than you actually have. As for the final message, I'm quite confused as to why Pac voting Snapa while Slyv was on Spore makes any difference here, yet that's the sole evidence presented in this post before leading up to the conclusion that Pac is suspicious. The post almost comes across as if Slyv was expecting Pac to follow their vote. The ending line sticks out a lot to me though, the phrasing "Okay, pac is also suspicious" is phrased as if Pac is only just now being tacked on to their sus list, while the following line "IDK who to trust here" additionally implies that they must've had some trust in Pac to begin with. Assuming this is the case, this feels like such a weird pivot of suspicion to go from, at least mildy, trusting someone to suddenly making a post against them (one with no evidence to even justify it as well, as previously mentioned). This feels like a lazy attempt at helping bolster a wagon other than the one on Slyv themselves so they can be relieved of a bit of pressure. After this, Sylv went on a war path against Pac, however, Pac's only reply to these posts sounds very calm, largely just discussing the specifics of the strategy they had proposed early in the game rather than actually fighting back: Pac n cheese is sus: Part Two (Electric Boogaloo) "Maf RB's target will contradict the kill!" No shit, Sherlock. Scum wouldn't want to RB the person getting killed, because, well, they're getting killed. Also, both cop and bodyguard on cyan?! What?!?! Most of the time, you don't want to protect the person who you sr, because, well, you think they're scum. And scum should not, can not, and will not kill themselves. Besides, I thought you said that everyone in the first 7 people to talk group was town in your eyes? Unless you think that cyan is the "one scum in our group if there is any". Okay, but maf can just try to kill them again, right? And if they're scum, then rest of maf will kill the cop claim. ---- More info about the Pac n cheese bandwagon. Let's make this an official wagon, guys! I meant that the mafia rb would be contradicting the mafia through out the game in day (chat) smh not just on the kill which is why I asked them to clear cyan, for me they are capable of suggesting this or being the mafia rb'er themselves. But that is again pmeta. They would avoid as many interaction with the rb'er person cuz it is literally their hugest asset, having em linked with any of the mafia goons would be dumb and if they can't rb cop or other pr's it would heavily impact their chances to win. As far as the night action talk goes, yes I should have revisited you raised a valid point which I overlooked though I would just like to bring "assume the townie we demanded got cleared as a townie" to light as a rule for town so we cannot demand cop claims d2 just to clear a townie or so and bring attention to potential cop. The latter on you saying they will get killed then let me rephrase it cop gets to know the exact role so we can cop someone till we get the mafia rb'er though getting a consensus on who has to be the one who gets copped or checked will help alot so we can keep track of who could have been or could have not been mafia goons. And if they try to kill em again a conf townie they are gonna waste a nk. You can extract whatever you want from this but yeh. Also if, hypothetically, I am a mafia then where are and who are my partners? Pac's following message largely explained their thoughts on each of the players: Also as for the ohsnapa shift I never pushed it or actively pursued it. I switched to nv cuz it seemed to me the best call since at that time I had no debatable cases on anyone other than pmeta and wanted to deal with it genuinely after the n1 results come and post my analysis based on that. But all the same I would explain why I hadn't given any reads too, when the game started 4 people were active when I saw the announcement ohsnapa, mib, sylv and spor, the rvs call by sylv, getting on me traversing through all the other 3 ACTIVE players in less than an hour or so made me doubt they were aligned with any of them and cyan and erry coming and cooling things down made em seem towny and atm my reads would have been nothing but pmeta and other is sus, like sylv was doing, so yeh nothing of contribution could have been formed off them so I thought the most help I could give atm was by proposing ideas or scenarios. Thought all the same ohsnapa gave up shitposting and seems genuinely contributed which makes em a tr for me, cyan giving off townleading vibes with his consistent aid and requesting others to form paragraphs etc (this contradicts with my above statement of cyan ik, but I wanna be sure they aren't pulling a 1000iq play they are smart as mafia), erry idk, MIM has been trying and sylv has been doing nothing but pursuing people as individuals and forming arguments based off their certain playstyle though that one line about shiftvoting despite they have deviated from it lol, makes me wanna tr em. I can't quite form reads on others I haven't seen em in ps so it is weird and new. The rest is that I am hesitant to post my reads on people cuz ik they impact alot for the X person in the read and might change the scenario of the game if they are scum or town and opposite to what I posted about them, so yeh trying to play safe. What I find really interesting about this is their analysis of Sylv, "sylv has been doing nothing but pursuing people as individuals and forming arguments based off their certain playstyle though that one line about shiftvoting despite they have deviated from it lol, makes me wanna tr em." The logic here makes absolutely no sense to me, most of the posts where Sylv has been "pursuing people as individuals" they've literally just been saying the most surface level things (not even actually related to the game) such as consistently correcting people's grammar instead of forming real reads. After the "positives" of Sylv they also listed a negative, but I find it interesting that the negative they listed was just that they didn't stick to their guns about shiftvoting despite there being literally pages of people talking about negatives and suspicious activity related to Sylv. It honestly feels like they wanted to find a reason to TR Sylv, but just couldn't so they tried to make them sound better than they actually were and used it as justification for their town read. At this point I'm beginning to believe that Slyv pushing Pac so hard is done for two reasons, firstly to help alleviate pressure on themselves, but also to make it very clear that Sylv is strongly against Pac, which would also explain very blatantly bold lines such as "More info about the Pac n cheese bandwagon. Let's make this an official wagon, guys!" that honestly just stick out like a sore thumb. *Conclusions* As for why they'd want to make it abhorrently clear that they're against Pac, I'm inclined to believe its because they may be a scum team and since both of them were being pushed here (with good odds that one of them gets voted off) it could very well help save face for the other if people believe they're not connected. Looking at Pac's side of things, if we do assume that Pac is scum here, then we know that they attempted to align themselves with 6 "town," however, if they really are scum then the idea that all 6 of those players really are town feels a bit farfetched to me. It makes much more sense for them to propose a plan like that if they had at least one other scum in the 6 to help back them up, additionally, the way they phrased it feels like a bad attempt at trying to clear everyone in that group, in a sense (which could imply an attempt at clearing a partner as well). One of the 6 in question was Slyv. Going back to their interactions with them, they largely glanced over Sylv hard-pushing them as if not actually worried about it and then proceeded to list some half-baked reasons as to why they believe Sylv is town. It really feels like they're trying to avoid extra suspicion on Sylv by not fighting back and also giving them that TR. tldr; I believe its entirely possible that Slyv and Pac could be a scum team here. I'm going to Vote Pac here, regardless of how this flips I believe we gain a ton of information out of it based on the interactions so far. |
|
|
|
Post by erry on Jul 4, 2022 17:06:45 GMT
Im caught up and ngl it was a little painful trying to read all that. This is a very telling post. None of these reads have much substance at all, for instance, in the Spore read it feels like you listed something then realized that it didn't actually make them scum so you tacked something else onto the end as a side note. What I also find it interesting that Sylv chose to switch votes here given Cyan's very recent FOS on Mem. If they were scum here I honestly can't see a reason for them to make this post and try to cast blame on other players, as well as switch votes here (Unless they're scum partners with Mem). The read on Snapa is the most interesting part of this post though, they listed actual reasons as to why they scum read Snapa (moreso than the read on Spore at least), but then at the end they decide to vote Spore over Snapa when changing vote (Despite the fact that, again, their read on Spore felt largely half-baked). As for this post, as a few others have pointed out, it doesn't seem likely that scum would make a post here that directly implies suspicious behavior on their part/blatantly trying hard to look innocent. Elaborating on those notes a bit further, this post feels more like nervous town overthinking things (Since people have been looking at Sylv as potential scum), and trying to prove their innocence, than actual scum. Finally, this is another very bad post. I mean this in the nicest way possible, but this is such weird thing to post as either scum or town. For town this feels like a "haha look I'm innocent!" post, rather than an actual attempt to vote either of them out (Unless you're really bad town) While for scum this feels more like a "haha look I'm innocent because I'm making reads!" post than an actual attempt to vote either of them out... (Unless you're really bad scum..) I feel as though the first scenario is more-likely given a very similar line of logic appearing in their previous post (As previously mentioned). Regardless, in either scenario Sylv wouldn't have been making the best plays though for their alignment. So going back the initial post mentioned, reading it again under the lens that Sylv is just playing bad, it fits in-line with them being bad town, for the reasons mentioned in response to said post. tldr; tl on Sylv (Don't think they're scum, just very bad town) Very well put post. what do you think of the people who are seemly trying to get Sylveon & Rando voted. Do you think they are misguided town? and maybe a opportunity to jump on a favorable read. Also while I'm online rn I wanted to say sorry for not getting back to this, I was planning to look through some ISOs to reach some more solid conclusions in regards to this, but fsr my search is only going back a few hours and if I'm being honest I don't have the energy to go back and fully reread 14 pages of messages. If I find a way to fix my search then I'll get back to you on this. |
|
|
|
Post by chaostrodon on Jul 4, 2022 17:29:09 GMT
Im caught up and ngl it was a little painful trying to read all that. Very well put post. what do you think of the people who are seemly trying to get Sylveon & Rando voted. Do you think they are misguided town? and maybe a opportunity to jump on a favorable read. Also while I'm online rn I wanted to say sorry for not getting back to this, I was planning to look through some ISOs to reach some more solid conclusions in regards to this, but fsr my search is only going back a few hours and if I'm being honest I don't have the energy to go back and fully reread 14 pages of messages. If I find a way to fix my search then I'll get back to you on this. Go to peoples profiles and click on most recent posts , thats what I do . It works bc theres not a lot of games going on here usually |
|
Sylveon & Rando
Innocent Child
"No! You can't just meme about how much you have posted!" "Haha VT go brrrrrr"
Posts: 75 
|
Post by Sylveon & Rando on Jul 4, 2022 17:46:23 GMT
aight so like, not rlly in the mood to do this shit rn, but i feel like sylv is using a lot of appeal to emotion their lines use a lot of passive aggressive yet this kind of uhhhhhhh, fuck how do i describe it. it's like you want to give them pity because of how they're sounding, like, you can tell they're very nervous right now, their lines display out of place tones. this is noticeable in some cases You say I'm trying to sound nervous, but you're also saying "uhhh, how do I describe it" like you've been forced to talk in front of a classroom full of kids, with no script ready. Sounds like hypocrisy!for example, - they put exclamation marks in places that probably shouldnt be there - for example, making comments about doing fish - commenting about how stressful forums is - and other shit like that Snapa, that's me being energetic. You're projecting. over all you would think these are really simple lines and shouldn't be looked into but the more you see more of these lines the more you'll realize that these lines are very very very off putting. like, it makes you ask why the fuck they exist, like, why are they saying these lines, i cant say they're filler because filler is less useful than these, if anything they're very weird reactionsWhy did it take you so much words just to say "These lines are weird IMO" Oh, I know! You're trying to sound nervous!!! Btw, I only made three of these lines!!!!! This is over exaggeration.it's one of those lines that you will give a null read about at first glance, but when you actually start reading them, it gives you this gut feeling that you're unable to describe them. - they also make uhhhhhhhhh, fuck what's it called, they make lines that are out of character or out of place, you know? like More obvious emotional appeal. This is starting to seem like padding. - i mean it's not really in character of sylveon to say shit like "oh let's go see blah blah blah" or some other shit Neither is it in character of you. I'm just adapting to forum mafia's longer day talk and more information in each read.dude, i dont fucking know how to describe sylveon 100% analytically but tldr; they're just very off putting, their lines are so out of place, but I know for a fact that Sylveon isn't calm. Sylveon is either nervous or panicky, they're not panicking, but they're panicky. That's in PS Mafia, where we don't have 2 entire days worth of daytime. Also, we can see lines as they're being sent on Showdown.
mmib is just, dude i dont know what to say about mmib honestly, but what I do know is that mmib is very consistent.Again, the green text is just annoying. Also, you could just remove the non green text, and you'd still get the same effect.mmib knows that I tr them, which isn't normal, which he knows but despite this fact, they never change their tone even by a bit when continuing to speak. each line possesses the same aura and confidence, which is what a townie would do. Even if a scum member would be confident like a townie that would be very hard to pull off and would personally require tremendous skill. This is heavily based on who's confident. Well, in your eyes. Your eyes that can't tell the difference between nervousness and energeticness.right now i think mmib is just the towniest here, along with erry, but i havent kept up with reading erry You're padding this claim by talking about erry for a second. I'm gonna need to make a version where I take out all the padding and boil it down to the most fundamental concepts.i know for a fact that some people are sussing out mmib for some reason, but this just proves my point even further despite mmib being thought suspiscious of, they still remain in their consistent posture. This is bullshit. Nobody's suspicious about him here.there is one flaw about this explanation though, it's that mmib was inconsistent, but i only found one inconsistency it was when they said they were going to sleep, came back and read my line about this whole fucking, like, ohsnapa's scale, or some shit, then kept using the scale as a means of displaying reads, I argee, that's inconsistent. What's also inconsistent is you refering to yourself in the third person.other than that i think they're fairly townieSnapa's text might look normal now, but from this point on in the original post, the text was black. This was definitely not on accident either.i think my most interesting read in this segment: One of Zach and Shadow are scum / both are highly likely to not be alignedThis is the most normal read, actually. Less padding, and actually decent points. I don't have the time to cover it rn, however. I need a break.Zach's first few lines are particularly aggressive. Not really aggressive, only particularly. This doesn't always indicate townie behavior. But in the case of Zach, it's simply different. Zach's read on Pac caught my attention, not because of their read particularly, but by the tone and method of their reading. It's clear that Zach's approach to reading Pac was aggressive. Personally, put simply, a scum member would not start their approach of D1 like Zach would do. (But I may be wrong, but I'm inclined to believe that Zach is towny here simply because of their tone and attacking style). Personally, a scum member would start their day off by being calm and collected. This isn't always the case, but take a look at Shadow's lines. On the side of shadoweavile, we see them approach D1 as calmly as possible, which is fine by town's standard, this doesn't necessarily mean that Shadow is scum. But if we take a look at town's whole aura right now, it's fairly tense. In conclusion, Shadow's the exact opposite of what Zach is, and this doesn't tell us that one of them is scum, but by looking at the whole interaction between all members of town, and with the aura of town, I can say that not only was Shadow's reads very lacking and lazily written, I can also conclude that they're very scummy in comparison to Zach. But this could be applied in the reverse as well. Zach could be scum for having an aggressive starting approach to D1, while Shadow can be a town member having a calm approach to D1. If anything, I would want to see shadow and Zach play more, and see if they're both consistent with their tones and reads. Overall: One of Zach and Shadow are scum. Leaning Shadow as scummy between them. this read really feels like something i pulled out of my fucking ass but i really think shadow is scummy for their tones and overall aura when paired with town. They're not with the town when we look at it from a playing style approach.
zach is very much with town if we look at it from a playing style approachAs always, comments are in purple! Gonna work on the trimmed down version. |
|
Sylveon & Rando
Innocent Child
"No! You can't just meme about how much you have posted!" "Haha VT go brrrrrr"
Posts: 75
|
Post by Sylveon & Rando on Jul 4, 2022 18:05:42 GMT
aight so like, not rlly in the mood to do this shit rn, but i feel like we need a more cut and dry version of this argument.sylv is using a lot of appeal to emotion their lines use a lot of passive aggressive yet this kind of nervousness? you can tell because their lines display a lot of out of place tones. for example, - they put exclamation marks in places that probably shouldnt be there - for example, making comments about doing fish - and commenting about how stressful forums is over all you would think these are really simple lines and shouldn't be looked into but the more you see more of these lines the more you'll realize that these lines are very weird.
it's one of those lines that you will give a null read about at first glance, but when you actually start reading them, it gives you this gut feeling that you're unable to describe them. - they also make lines that are out of character or out of place, you know? like - i mean it's not really in character of sylveon to say shit like "oh let's go see blah blah blah" tldr; they're just very off putting, their lines are so out of place, but I know for a fact that Sylveon isn't calm. Sylveon is either nervous or panicky.
mmib is very consistent.mmib knows that I tr them, which isn't normal. but despite this fact, they never change their tone even by a bit when continuing to speak, which is what a townie would do. Even if a scum member would be confident like a townie that would be very hard to pull off and would personally require tremendous skill. right now i think mmib is just the towniest here. i know for a fact that some people are sussing out mmib for some reason, but this just proves my point even further despite mmib being thought suspiscious of, they still remain in their consistent posture. there is one flaw about this explanation though, it's that mmib was inconsistent, but i only found one inconsistency it was when they said they were going to sleep, came back and read my line about my scale, then kept using the scale as a means of displaying reads, other than that i think they're fairly towniei think my most interesting read in this segment: One of Zach and Shadow are scum / both are highly likely to not be aligned
Zach's first few lines are particularly aggressive . This doesn't always indicate townie behavior, but in the case of Zach, it's simply different. Zach's read on Pac caught my attention, because of the tone and method of their reading. It's clear that Zach's approach to reading Pac was aggressive. Personally, I don't think a scum member would not start their approach of D1 like Zach would do.
Personally, a scum member would start their day off by being calm and collected. This isn't always the case, but take a look at Shadow's lines. On the side of shadoweavile, we see them approach D1 as calmly as possible. But if we take a look at town's whole aura right now, it's fairly tense. In conclusion, Shadow's the exact opposite of what Zach is, and this doesn't tell us that one of them is scum, but by looking at the whole interaction between all members of town, and with the aura of town, I can say that not only was Shadow's reads very lacking and lazily written, I can also conclude that they're very scummy in comparison to Zach. But this could be applied in the reverse as well. Zach could be scum for having an aggressive starting approach to D1, while Shadow can be a town member having a calm approach to D1. If anything, I would want to see Shadow and Zach play more, and see if they're both consistent with their tones and reads. Overall: One of Zach and Shadow are scum. Leaning Shadow as scummy between them. this read really feels like something i pulled out of my fucking ass but i really think shadow is scummy for their tones and overall aura when paired with town. They're not with the town when we look at it from a playing style approach.
zach is very much with town if we look at it from a playing style approachRemoved the padding! As you can see, me and mem have very little information in our reads. This is why I don't think they're really good. |
|
|
|
Post by mymemoryisbad on Jul 4, 2022 19:27:37 GMT
Pac n cheese is sus: Part Two (Electric Boogaloo) Cop on cyan, body on cyan and rb on syvl imo, The safest thing will be to assume that mafia rb will be acting alone contradicting the mafia goons. "Maf RB's target will contradict the kill!" No shit, Sherlock. Scum wouldn't want to RB the person getting killed, because, well, they're getting killed. Also, both cop and bodyguard on cyan?! What?!?! Most of the time, you don't want to protect the person who you sr, because, well, you think they're scum. And scum should not, can not, and will not kill themselves. Besides, I thought you said that everyone in the first 7 people to talk group was town in your eyes? Unless you think that cyan is the "one scum in our group if there is any". Will be best if we did this with a consensus and unless d2 or future days the cop doesn't claim and call someone for being scum, We will assume that person we demanded got cleared as a townie. Body on that said person to at least get some conf town players alive to act as a medium of trust for the days. Will help isolating the iso's and interactions from my perspective Okay, but maf can just try to kill them again, right? And if they're scum, then rest of maf will kill the cop claim. ---- More info about the Pac n cheese bandwagon. Let's make this an official wagon, guys! "official wagon" err thats just kinda silly tbh cuz wagons dont need to be official and you make it sound like ur raising money for poor children lmao anyway im honestly down for voting pac tho, as they have just fillered and factored in prs so early even tho that was completely irrelevant early on. also we dont need prs to read/conf people, we ourselves can read- also theyve been tryna find out all this alignment stuff or whos with who and i just dont feel that its progressing the game at all i feel like pac could possibly be a scum trying to out some prs or push nv or smthn so they can have an nk, but does scum really out themselves like that d1 in such an obvious fashion? still, theyre an sl at -2 |
|
|
|
Post by mymemoryisbad on Jul 4, 2022 19:41:08 GMT
ok so i didnt see all of what pac posted (i was making the post, left and came back) and am seeing that hes starting to make more sense than what he was before, probably up to -1 now. also im shifting my focus to chaos now, i feel like they have breezed past this game a bit. vote for now is staying on sylv but can be shifted to pac.
|
|
|
|
Post by mymemoryisbad on Jul 4, 2022 19:56:47 GMT
Just woke up. Time to read!!! Also care to elaborate?
this has to be the laziest elaboration i have seen... this is why im starting to sr chaos they have been making these one-line "read" posts, which are just so seemingly basic and really not showing much use of evidence or info. also the elaboration i am currently responding to seems to just be them trying to be careful in getting called out by zach a lot of chaos's posts are just so basic, and im not seeing any solid reads or getting anything townie from them. the way they just seem to coast/filler in their posts and go on with the game is telling me theyre scum |
|
|
|
Post by mymemoryisbad on Jul 4, 2022 20:02:09 GMT
These two post giving me scum vibes. Vote chaostrodonHere a Hot take of mine: pacncheese probably fits the Archetype of a typical town with unpopular opinions / prone to Mis-voting. What are your thoughts on it. what a defense! really convincing him to not vote you with what i have been pushing on chaos this only proves my point more. the whole "my stuff got deleted whooops" and then making reads based off of feelings from one post just seems like a convenient excuse to not post reads and act like you actually have reasoning behind ur srs also there is most likely some sort of undo button or some shit so i really dislike that excuse since chaos isnt under any actual pressure i just think he feels like he doesnt need a good defense, but i think thats a stretch |
|
|
|
Post by mymemoryisbad on Jul 4, 2022 20:03:02 GMT
[/b]unvote sylveon, vote chaos
|
|
|
|
Post by mymemoryisbad on Jul 4, 2022 20:04:14 GMT
god dammit [/b]unvote sylveon, vote chaos
|
|
|
|
Post by mymemoryisbad on Jul 4, 2022 20:05:01 GMT
unvote sylveon vote chaos bolding here is bullshit + mb on boldfailing like 3 times
|
|
|
|
Post by mymemoryisbad on Jul 4, 2022 20:21:55 GMT
1. I'm actually gen z myself, and this is the first time I've seen something like that. 2. Day ends at 10:30pm and I have plur I think? So if I got a good night's sleep between posts I'd probably already be dead. 3. What are the lapses in logic? You need to explain so I know what you're talking about. This is my first forum game, just so you're aware.
Secondly , just because someone trs you doesnt mean they should be voting with you , you are confusing tring and sheepinggen z has nothing to do with mafia but ok im sorry but i dont see a clear explanation of the "lapses in logic". also when did spore get into that convo? anyway i feel like that post just explains basic terms rather than explaining the lapses also the 1st 3 people online could of course have scum in it (not me dawg im town) but rn other people are scummier due to their posts, reasoning, or logic (like you) anyway idk who u meant when u said "no way does simply saying something improbable deserve a vote" but its more likely that that person had multiple posts or is consistently doing something that doesnt make sense (i feel like ur talking about pac). if ur talking about sylv then they most definitely have said more than a couple improbable things |
|
|
|
Post by chaostrodon on Jul 4, 2022 21:04:43 GMT
The aggression and attacking style looks similar , would be a stretch to pursue based on that , just making a note for myself later
this has to be the laziest elaboration i have seen... this is why im starting to sr chaos they have been making these one-line "read" posts, which are just so seemingly basic and really not showing much use of evidence or info. also the elaboration i am currently responding to seems to just be them trying to be careful in getting called out by zach a lot of chaos's posts are just so basic, and im not seeing any solid reads or getting anything townie from them. the way they just seem to coast/filler in their posts and go on with the game is telling me theyre scum
If you want to see me do that , you have to wait a bit until late game
I would recommend not judging people by the length of their posts however , that can lead to a lot of disappointment
|
|
|
|
Post by chaostrodon on Jul 4, 2022 21:06:08 GMT
I dont think spore really meant that , and even if he did , why cant the first 3 people who talk be scum? Also no way does simply saying something improbable deserve a vote.
Secondly , just because someone trs you doesnt mean they should be voting with you , you are confusing tring and sheeping gen z has nothing to do with mafia but ok im sorry but i dont see a clear explanation of the "lapses in logic". also when did spore get into that convo? anyway i feel like that post just explains basic terms rather than explaining the lapses also the 1st 3 people online could of course have scum in it (not me dawg im town) but rn other people are scummier due to their posts, reasoning, or logic (like you) anyway idk who u meant when u said "no way does simply saying something improbable deserve a vote" but its more likely that that person had multiple posts or is consistently doing something that doesnt make sense (i feel like ur talking about pac). if ur talking about sylv then they most definitely have said more than a couple improbable things |
|
|
|
Post by chaostrodon on Jul 4, 2022 21:16:14 GMT
Would recommend retuning your vibes indicator what a defense! really convincing him to not vote you with what i have been pushing on chaos this only proves my point more. the whole "my stuff got deleted whooops" and then making reads based off of feelings from one post just seems like a convenient excuse to not post reads and act like you actually have reasoning behind ur srs also there is most likely some sort of undo button or some shit so i really dislike that excuse since chaos isnt under any actual pressure i just think he feels like he doesnt need a good defense, but i think thats a stretch
For the record , the only sl is have as of now is pac n cheese.
Tls include spore , snapa and erry . Everyone else is null , but cyan and zach's playstyles have been pinging me a bit |
|
|
|
Post by zachattack01 on Jul 4, 2022 22:42:03 GMT
Are we going to have another vote count update before Day 1 formally ends?
|
|
|
|
Post by zachattack01 on Jul 4, 2022 23:01:45 GMT
also cyan i have a question it's been 7 hours and you haven't asked shit lmao |
|
|
|
Post by micromorphic on Jul 4, 2022 23:02:37 GMT
Votecount 1.1
 
If there's an error in the votecount, please message me now.
If the day were to end, pacncheese would be voted. Deadline in 3 hours and 28 minutes.
|
|
|
|
Post by zachattack01 on Jul 4, 2022 23:08:43 GMT
Appreciate it. Seems that all 12 people that have spoken have voted. That's good
|
|
|
|
Post by kliff on Jul 4, 2022 23:55:58 GMT
Ok I think this was a over-reaction and I don't like it. Something doesn't seem right here we havent seen much of angel, pac, erry, and idt ive seen a lot of chaos either. idr that much shadow either also yeah the little interaction there- angels entry post was fine imo, it was similar to shadows entry post organization wise. also it wasnt angels only post my main point however is that you could have commented a lot more there, or brought up some more info. instead you chose to just say some very basic summed up wording without much thought/logic Angel has 3 post. I thought the first one looked town and then the latest one looked suspicious. They were quick to play the "Sounds to me like ur looking for an easy vote" card and haven't really done much. I think it seems pretty schemy, after taking into account of their progression deficiencies. Pac is either scum or badtown, and I'm betting on scum. To use snapa's scoring system, Pac n cheese is a 1 at best, and a -4 at worst. I skimmed through your iso and I think you are betting that Pac n Cheese is a self destructing Scum, Since they don't make sense. Do you think anyone is bussing? Pac n Cheese is a  rn |
|
