|
Post by AlexSnaq on May 23, 2024 12:44:38 GMT
what i hate about how stp was playing is that you could tell he was v analytical and paying attention to try and see who i would shoot which is like coming from a scum mindset, so i think he was very much capable of doccing ck knowing we might shoot there. like he already showed he had the ability to go through my iso to see who i would shoot for some weird reason -🅰🅻🅴🆇🅰 This one cuddlebros-🅰🅻🅴🆇🅰
|
|
|
Post by cuddlebros on May 23, 2024 12:46:41 GMT
I mean, I only rlly started getting analytical when I belived that u were shooting in me and scumplay, atp I wasnt really concerned with reading who u would shoot.
|
|
|
Post by cuddlebros on May 23, 2024 13:33:52 GMT
oml i just lost my entire fucking wallpost im done
|
|
|
Post by cuddlebros on May 23, 2024 13:34:31 GMT
like genuinelly not playing anymore, fuck this bullshit
|
|
|
Post by cuddlebros on May 23, 2024 13:34:47 GMT
spent like an hour finding shit for pqslays + turt and its all gone
|
|
|
Post by cuddlebros on May 23, 2024 13:41:57 GMT
I was reading twr iso and theres a lot of times where they slip knowing that vig was docced, they also just had like... bad progression going from pqslays town to one of pqslays/caedj, mentions that it could be me and pqslays yet just goes back to pqslays town and scumplay scum, and then never decides the town between pqslays/caedj, and now we get here where there just tunneling fnr, dont ask for quotes bc i spent an hour finding them and not doing that shit again (basic summary)
Ill give at least one post where twr softs knowing vig is docced tho
|
|
|
Post by cuddlebros on May 23, 2024 13:44:35 GMT
Fair. I just thought that there is a very small chance that they were random doc'd by scum, makes no sense, but the chance IS there - vade there are earlier example that ill post as well
|
|
|
Post by cuddlebros on May 23, 2024 13:46:43 GMT
No alex death means that both scum factions would have not shot thinking that the other would kill them therefore I think that both kills are scum and the big shot got docced, just a theory pending alexsnaq's confirmation - vade
|
|
|
Post by cuddlebros on May 23, 2024 13:47:00 GMT
I mean I think Its dependent on vig shot but I'm guessing that both kills were scum kills. I don't think that either PW/Darkness was a candidate for a vig shot from alex - vade
|
|
|
Post by cuddlebros on May 23, 2024 13:50:25 GMT
ill try to check to pqslays iso but dont expect quotes, not doing that shit again
|
|
|
Post by AlexSnaq on May 23, 2024 14:49:02 GMT
yeah i really think thats a big indication of them having tmi. revealing their hand too early on knowing someone was docced. -🅰🅻🅴🆇🅰
|
|
|
Post by AlexSnaq on May 23, 2024 14:49:30 GMT
Cuz Snaq wouldn't lie to us about the shot so if they didn't shoot Darkness or PW then it means vig shot into a defended slot? -pq I mentioned this to Alex earlier but didn't have time to post yet, but this post is IMO the most 'TMI'-y post of the bunch at sod3. Not only feels like they knew we shot into a defended shot, but the 'wouldn't lie to us' also almost lets it slip through that our target was town? - Snaq
|
|
|
Post by AlexSnaq on May 23, 2024 14:49:52 GMT
Cuz Snaq wouldn't lie to us about the shot so if they didn't shoot Darkness or PW then it means vig shot into a defended slot? -pq No they def could have shotten darkness, psure both slots thought they wrre ww This is probably the most reasonable post around that time - Snaq
|
|
|
Post by SylvieSlays2 on May 23, 2024 15:23:05 GMT
Cuz Snaq wouldn't lie to us about the shot so if they didn't shoot Darkness or PW then it means vig shot into a defended slot? -pq I mentioned this to Alex earlier but didn't have time to post yet, but this post is IMO the most 'TMI'-y post of the bunch at sod3. Not only feels like they knew we shot into a defended shot, but the 'wouldn't lie to us' also almost lets it slip through that our target was town? - Snaq No this is logic not TMI. If you weren't blocked AND you didn't shoot PW or Darkness, then a 3rd person should be dead that day because you weren't blocked. So it had to be one or the other being true. And the reason I said "Snaq wouldn't lie to us" about who they shot is because you're uncc'd vig so I trust that you wouldn't lie to us and so we would actually know if it was a blocked kill or an overlapped kill. -pq
|
|
|
Post by AlexSnaq on May 23, 2024 15:24:20 GMT
I mentioned this to Alex earlier but didn't have time to post yet, but this post is IMO the most 'TMI'-y post of the bunch at sod3. Not only feels like they knew we shot into a defended shot, but the 'wouldn't lie to us' also almost lets it slip through that our target was town? - Snaq No this is logic not TMI. If you weren't blocked AND you didn't shoot PW or Darkness, then a 3rd person should be dead that day because you weren't blocked. So it had to be one or the other being true. And the reason I said "Snaq wouldn't lie to us" about who they shot is because you're uncc'd vig so I trust that you wouldn't lie to us and so we would actually know if it was a blocked kill or an overlapped kill. -pq but us shooting darkness that night was a very high possibility. we hard wolf read them as did most ppl. saying "we wouldnt lie" is crazy tho. -🅰🅻🅴🆇🅰
|
|
|
Post by AlexSnaq on May 23, 2024 15:27:18 GMT
I mentioned this to Alex earlier but didn't have time to post yet, but this post is IMO the most 'TMI'-y post of the bunch at sod3. Not only feels like they knew we shot into a defended shot, but the 'wouldn't lie to us' also almost lets it slip through that our target was town? - Snaq No this is logic not TMI. If you weren't blocked AND you didn't shoot PW or Darkness, then a 3rd person should be dead that day because you weren't blocked. So it had to be one or the other being true. And the reason I said "Snaq wouldn't lie to us" about who they shot is because you're uncc'd vig so I trust that you wouldn't lie to us and so we would actually know if it was a blocked kill or an overlapped kill. -pq "if you weren't blocked" blocked how? How'd you know we didn't shoot PW or darkness? I get we wouldn't lie, but why's that important to state there? - Snaq
|
|
|
Post by SylvieSlays2 on May 23, 2024 15:30:18 GMT
No this is logic not TMI. If you weren't blocked AND you didn't shoot PW or Darkness, then a 3rd person should be dead that day because you weren't blocked. So it had to be one or the other being true. And the reason I said "Snaq wouldn't lie to us" about who they shot is because you're uncc'd vig so I trust that you wouldn't lie to us and so we would actually know if it was a blocked kill or an overlapped kill. -pq but us shooting darkness that night was a very high possibility. we hard wolf read them as did most ppl. saying "we wouldnt lie" is crazy tho. -🅰🅻🅴🆇🅰 Yes, but I wasn't talking about probability here, I was talking about possibility here. I said that the only 2 possible ways 2 people could die were if u shot PW or Darkness OR if u got blocked, and we would know for certain which scenario we were in because you have no reason to lie about which scenario we're in. So I wasn't considering which scenario was more likely because fmpov we had a 100% way to determine which scenario we were in and so it would be silly to theorize when we could just ask u -pq
|
|
|
Post by SylvieSlays2 on May 23, 2024 15:36:27 GMT
No this is logic not TMI. If you weren't blocked AND you didn't shoot PW or Darkness, then a 3rd person should be dead that day because you weren't blocked. So it had to be one or the other being true. And the reason I said "Snaq wouldn't lie to us" about who they shot is because you're uncc'd vig so I trust that you wouldn't lie to us and so we would actually know if it was a blocked kill or an overlapped kill. -pq "if you weren't blocked" blocked how? How'd you know we didn't shoot PW or darkness? I get we wouldn't lie, but why's that important to state there? - Snaq No I think you're misunderstanding me. I'm making an argument by contradiction here where u assume that neither of the two scenarios are happening and get a contradictory result. I assume that you're not blocked and I assume that you didn't kill PW or Darkness and I deduce that there should've been 3 kills instead of 2. So it must be that one or the other scenario is true because otherwise u get a contradiction. It's literally just logic -pq
|
|
|
Post by SylvieSlays2 on May 23, 2024 15:41:17 GMT
No this is logic not TMI. If you weren't blocked AND you didn't shoot PW or Darkness, then a 3rd person should be dead that day because you weren't blocked. So it had to be one or the other being true. And the reason I said "Snaq wouldn't lie to us" about who they shot is because you're uncc'd vig so I trust that you wouldn't lie to us and so we would actually know if it was a blocked kill or an overlapped kill. -pq "if you weren't blocked" blocked how? How'd you know we didn't shoot PW or darkness? I get we wouldn't lie, but why's that important to state there? - Snaq Also it's important to state that you wouldn't lie to prove that we actually can say which scenario we're in. Like if I said "I know a way to figure out how the night happened" then I'm not sure people would've been like "well prove it" so I just skipped to the explanation of how we can figure out which scenario we were in -pq
|
|
|
Post by AlexSnaq on May 23, 2024 15:46:27 GMT
but why would you automatically assume we didnt shoot either pw or darkness? feels crazy to auto make that assumption or even think of that right off the bat like that.
like why not just wait for us to say who we shot? why do you need to try and solve it yourself like that idgi -🅰🅻🅴🆇🅰
|
|
|
Post by SylvieSlays2 on May 23, 2024 15:57:20 GMT
but why would you automatically assume we didnt shoot either pw or darkness? feels crazy to auto make that assumption or even think of that right off the bat like that. like why not just wait for us to say who we shot? why do you need to try and solve it yourself like that idgi -🅰🅻🅴🆇🅰 I essentially asked "In the hypothetical scenario where Darkness and PW weren't shot, then this must mean vig got blocked, right?" It was more of a question to see if my logic was right and not a question of which scenario we're in. And this is why I asked that question in the first place cuz if my logic was wrong then asking u who u shot doesn't fix my broken logic -pq
|
|
|
Post by SylvieSlays2 on May 23, 2024 15:59:56 GMT
I was trying to figure out which scenarios were even possible before considering which ones were probable. -pq
|
|
|
Post by vaderaven on May 23, 2024 16:06:39 GMT
why isnt pq out yet
|
|
|
Post by cuddlebros on May 23, 2024 16:08:43 GMT
back btw
|
|
|
Post by cuddlebros on May 23, 2024 16:11:25 GMT
wild to say this to ur partner
|
|