|
|
Post by Floette on Feb 24, 2015 11:57:55 GMT
Why not just play on pretend you're xyyzy or w/e it is
In, but i know this will die
|
|
|
|
Post by ajhockeystar on Feb 24, 2015 12:03:11 GMT
So given the extremely large amount of players, I'm gonna have it so there are two judges each round, and the 3 players they choose only get 1 point each. (Otherwise one person could have 6 points in one round, which is pretty insane)
|
|
|
|
Post by FortColors on Feb 24, 2015 16:18:52 GMT
So given the extremely large amount of players, I'm gonna have it so there are two judges each round, and the 3 players they choose only get 1 point each. (Otherwise one person could have 6 points in one round, which is pretty insane) Imo give a +1 bonus to any player that is chosen by both judges, so they'd get 3 instead of 2. |
|
|
|
Post by Spieky on Feb 24, 2015 18:23:59 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 19:38:40 GMT
So given the extremely large amount of players, I'm gonna have it so there are two judges each round, and the 3 players they choose only get 1 point each. (Otherwise one person could have 6 points in one round, which is pretty insane) Imo give a +1 bonus to any player that is chosen by both judges, so they'd get 3 instead of 2. I conc keldur. Is that how you spell it? |
|
|
|
Post by ajhockeystar on Feb 24, 2015 20:34:44 GMT
So given the extremely large amount of players, I'm gonna have it so there are two judges each round, and the 3 players they choose only get 1 point each. (Otherwise one person could have 6 points in one round, which is pretty insane) Imo give a +1 bonus to any player that is chosen by both judges, so they'd get 3 instead of 2. I like it. Sounds good! |
|
|
|
Post by VigilanteVigoroth on Feb 24, 2015 20:41:52 GMT
Yay
|
|
|
|
Post by Floette on Feb 24, 2015 22:28:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by shinys123 on Feb 24, 2015 23:40:56 GMT
In
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 23:41:18 GMT
in
|
|
|
|
Post by Igpay»atinlay on Feb 24, 2015 23:44:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by superstarsrock on Feb 25, 2015 1:33:52 GMT
in
|
|
|
|
Post by ajhockeystar on Feb 25, 2015 2:19:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by rssp1 on Feb 25, 2015 4:31:45 GMT
>everyone else shall pm me
>posts in thread
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2015 4:32:21 GMT
Each round, there will be a prompt. Your goal is simply to try to respond to it in the funniest way possible. Out of all the players, each round two players will be chosen to be the judges. They won't submit an answer for that round, and instead they'll choose, in their opinion, the 3 funniest answers and rank them from 1-3. They won't know who submitted what answer though, to avoid bias. (And also please be honest when choosing, it makes the game more fun :D) First place gets 3 points, second gets 2, and third gets 1. For the people answering, all you have to do is PM me your answer. It has to be 5 words or less each round. Unlike the real game, you aren't bound to any "cards". Send in whatever you want! (As long as it's under 5 words.) And the rules were changed to two judges, each of whom can award one point to three answers. Fort suggested the implementation of a system wherein if both judges choose an individual, they recieve three points instead of two. I suggest the game keeps going until someone reaches 20 points. I also suggest that someone who has not been picked three rounds in a row loses one point and another for every round after that. This includes failing to submit a response. If someone reaches -5 points, they are elimunated. |
|
|
|
Post by rssp1 on Feb 25, 2015 6:36:52 GMT
I don't agree with the losing points part. I say either pick one or the other.
|
|
|
|
Post by Floette on Feb 25, 2015 10:45:16 GMT
Yeah, no loss of points
|
|
|
|
Post by Floette on Feb 25, 2015 10:45:59 GMT
Also, 24 is more appropriate, assuming both judges don't award the same card +3
|
|
|
|
Post by Floette on Feb 25, 2015 10:46:18 GMT
And...how safe for work will this be?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2015 14:51:26 GMT
Considering macle's and katos's entries, rather safe. The card game itself appears to be grossly inappropriate, but we get to choose our answers, so nobody wants to be 'that guy'.
|
|
|
|
Post by ajhockeystar on Feb 25, 2015 20:36:55 GMT
I've thought about it, and I think I'm going to remove the 3 point if both judges choose you thing. Instead, I'm going to add a "Host's Choice" point for each round, where I choose one person who gets one point. So yes, people can still get up to 3 points in one round.
Also, I'm probably going to make the winning points either 15 or 20, I'm going to decide that after everyone has been a judge though.
|
|
|
|
Post by FortColors on Feb 25, 2015 23:50:27 GMT
I've thought about it, and I think I'm going to remove the 3 point if both judges choose you thing. Instead, I'm going to add a "Host's Choice" point for each round, where I choose one person who gets one point. So yes, people can still get up to 3 points in one round. Also, I'm probably going to make the winning points either 15 or 20, I'm going to decide that after everyone has been a judge though. Imo add a clause for inactivity loses a point. |
|
|
|
Post by superstarsrock on Feb 26, 2015 0:13:42 GMT
fort you just wasted post #1,250
|
|
|
|
Post by plsdonthurtme on Feb 26, 2015 0:17:38 GMT
truuuuu
|
|
|
|
Post by FortColors on Feb 26, 2015 1:36:52 GMT
fort you just wasted post #1,250 1.25k is nothing m8 Im going for 10k, but 1mil is better and will never happen n_n |
|
