|
|
Post by motogp on Aug 10, 2018 9:25:02 GMT
wish I had time to put more effort into this
NLing in MyLo is objectively the best play and until host announces what kind of actions will be taken against infinite NLing,we have no reason not to
whoever lynches in MyLo is inherently suspicious,however I do TR OM Room so I'd like to throw suspicion on XnadrojX tomorrow
|
|
|
|
Post by motogp on Aug 10, 2018 9:29:21 GMT
Other thing I noticed actually and since we're permitted to talk during Twilight: Bomb Moss what makes you assume scum no-killed as opposed to scum being roleblocked? (Barring the obvious "no one claimed it" bit, because they may not even be paying attention) This is faking activity.This question does not contribute to scumhunting at all.A Roleblocker would never claim his target in MyLo due to scum having no reason not to NoLynch.What kind of response do you expect from him? "hey im scum and I killed but my kill didn't go through so I got roleblocked"? You are even responding with a potential answer yourself,quite seems like scum pressuring other scum without intention to bus if you ask me. |
|
|
|
Post by motogp on Aug 10, 2018 9:29:43 GMT
*scum having no reason not to idle
I suck
|
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 10, 2018 11:37:54 GMT
wish I had time to put more effort into this NLing in MyLo is objectively the best play and until host announces what kind of actions will be taken against infinite NLing,we have no reason not to whoever lynches in MyLo is inherently suspicious,however I do TR OM Room so I'd like to throw suspicion on XnadrojX tomorrow I tend to dislike generalities like the bolded, especially in this case considering that you yourself cast a vote in the last MyLo. What's the basis for your townread on OM? I'm curious since I haven't look into him that much yet. Other thing I noticed actually and since we're permitted to talk during Twilight: Bomb Moss what makes you assume scum no-killed as opposed to scum being roleblocked? (Barring the obvious "no one claimed it" bit, because they may not even be paying attention) This is faking activity.This question does not contribute to scumhunting at all.A Roleblocker would never claim his target in MyLo due to scum having no reason not to NoLynch.What kind of response do you expect from him? "hey im scum and I killed but my kill didn't go through so I got roleblocked"? You are even responding with a potential answer yourself,quite seems like scum pressuring other scum without intention to bus if you ask me. youwhat Why wouldn't a Roleblocker claim their target when they're the only PR in the game capable of causing a deathless night. I'm asking Xnad this because the fact that his first assumption was "oh, scum no-killed" indicates that he may know more about the presence, or lack thereof, of a Roleblocker in the setup. "No one claimed it" is very much also a "potential answer" and probably the most obvious one. |
|
|
|
Post by RADicate on Aug 10, 2018 12:54:27 GMT
Ugh, Fell asleep. Thats what i get for making the DL 3am. DEADLINE, NO LYNCH HAS OCCURRED. N4 STARTS. (votals will come after work today unless flushie wants to take em, everyone who voted NL'd tho)
DL is in 24 hours from now, 9am EST, 8/11.
|
|
|
|
Post by ForgotToFlush on Aug 10, 2018 13:10:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ForgotToFlush on Aug 10, 2018 13:10:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by RADicate on Aug 11, 2018 13:00:33 GMT
Welcome to day 5, DL in 48 hours, aka 9am 10/13.
|
|
|
|
Post by ForgotToFlush on Aug 11, 2018 14:02:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ForgotToFlush on Aug 11, 2018 14:08:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 11, 2018 14:28:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Schiavetto ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪ on Aug 11, 2018 16:37:06 GMT
Fuggit.
Lynch moto
|
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 11, 2018 23:32:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 11, 2018 23:33:30 GMT
Like how your read on moto compares to the one on Dasocks ig. That's one of the things from my EoD posting yesterday; it's still valid.
|
|
|
|
Post by motogp on Aug 12, 2018 8:51:32 GMT
Like how your read on moto compares to the one on Dasocks ig. That's one of the things from my EoD posting yesterday; it's still valid. You keep implying you scumread me,yet you also keep shifting attention to someone else when someone questions me. I'm not your traitor,and I don't like you making it seem that way |
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 12, 2018 12:16:06 GMT
Like how your read on moto compares to the one on Dasocks ig. That's one of the things from my EoD posting yesterday; it's still valid. You keep implying you scumread me,yet you also keep shifting attention to someone else when someone questions me. I'm not your traitor,and I don't like you making it seem that way I'm not scum, and even if I was I couldn't "make it seem that way" when scum doesn't know who their Traitor is barring a recruit. I asked about the comparison to the read on Dasocks yesterday and I'm following up on it (I don't "keep shifting attention"). |
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 12, 2018 12:22:00 GMT
wish I had time to put more effort into this NLing in MyLo is objectively the best play and until host announces what kind of actions will be taken against infinite NLing,we have no reason not to whoever lynches in MyLo is inherently suspicious,however I do TR OM Room so I'd like to throw suspicion on XnadrojX tomorrow I tend to dislike generalities like the bolded, especially in this case considering that you yourself cast a vote in the last MyLo. What's the basis for your townread on OM? I'm curious since I haven't look into him that much yet. This is faking activity.This question does not contribute to scumhunting at all.A Roleblocker would never claim his target in MyLo due to scum having no reason not to NoLynch.What kind of response do you expect from him? "hey im scum and I killed but my kill didn't go through so I got roleblocked"? You are even responding with a potential answer yourself,quite seems like scum pressuring other scum without intention to bus if you ask me. youwhat Why wouldn't a Roleblocker claim their target when they're the only PR in the game capable of causing a deathless night. I'm asking Xnad this because the fact that his first assumption was "oh, scum no-killed" indicates that he may know more about the presence, or lack thereof, of a Roleblocker in the setup. "No one claimed it" is very much also a "potential answer" and probably the most obvious one. Also still want to continue this discussion motogp. |
|
|
|
Post by motogp on Aug 12, 2018 12:36:29 GMT
I tend to dislike generalities like the bolded, especially in this case considering that you yourself cast a vote in the last MyLo. What's the basis for your townread on OM? I'm curious since I haven't look into him that much yet. youwhat Why wouldn't a Roleblocker claim their target when they're the only PR in the game capable of causing a deathless night. I'm asking Xnad this because the fact that his first assumption was "oh, scum no-killed" indicates that he may know more about the presence, or lack thereof, of a Roleblocker in the setup. "No one claimed it" is very much also a "potential answer" and probably the most obvious one. Also still want to continue this discussion motogp . Traitor gets osbp if not recruited according to the theme. I still don't understand why you asked a question while also mentioning a potential good answer at the same time,quite makes me think that you two are scum without daytalk. I townread OM due to his excessive contribution and helpfulness in the past days. Also statistically it's good to NL again,and allow a potential cop to give inspects so abstain from lynching |
|
|
|
Post by OM~! on Aug 12, 2018 15:18:06 GMT
I mean the low-thinking scum / town bro, stop getting offended ya lil bitch Lmfao nice joke Unlynch, No Lynchnl til I have time to play woot woot Bitch that isn't a buzzword, how hypocritical of you to use "buzzword" to accuse me of using terminology to make an argument (or whatever your original wording was) when you're the one doing it. I just wanted you to bloody further explain but
I like these reactions
|
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 12, 2018 20:57:38 GMT
Also still want to continue this discussion motogp . Traitor gets osbp if not recruited according to the theme. I still don't understand why you asked a question while also mentioning a potential good answer at the same time,quite makes me think that you two are scum without daytalk. I townread OM due to his excessive contribution and helpfulness in the past days. Also statistically it's good to NL again,and allow a potential cop to give inspects so abstain from lynchingJust realized I misread your earlier post as "You are not even responding with a potential answer yourself." Regardless, I still don't see the issue with the fact that I am. "No one claimed it" is such a blatant cop-out response that I'm obviously going to want to hear more than just that from Xnad. If we're scumbuddies what motivation do I have to call that out in the first place? It would actually be "statistically good" for a Roleblocker (if we have one) to claim with their targets for the past 2 nights, especially if they targeted the same person both times. I'm assuming that none of the more "active" players are a Roleblocker since they'd have claimed it, which leaves Dasocks~, Crespo, and bluegummybear. Until then I'm going to Vote: motogpFor some form of progress. |
|
|
|
Post by bluegummybear on Aug 13, 2018 0:02:58 GMT
Still Would Like to hear more from others and myself. i feel likes policying Toni XY still
|
|
|
|
Post by bluegummybear on Aug 13, 2018 0:05:33 GMT
Other thing I noticed actually and since we're permitted to talk during Twilight: Bomb Moss what makes you assume scum no-killed as opposed to scum being roleblocked? (Barring the obvious "no one claimed it" bit, because they may not even be paying attention) This is faking activity.This question does not contribute to scumhunting at all.A Roleblocker would never claim his target in MyLo due to scum having no reason not to NoLynch.What kind of response do you expect from him? "hey im scum and I killed but my kill didn't go through so I got roleblocked"? You are even responding with a potential answer yourself,quite seems like scum pressuring other scum without intention to bus if you ask me. Is this a soft |
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 13, 2018 2:42:14 GMT
This is faking activity.This question does not contribute to scumhunting at all.A Roleblocker would never claim his target in MyLo due to scum having no reason not to NoLynch.What kind of response do you expect from him? "hey im scum and I killed but my kill didn't go through so I got roleblocked"? You are even responding with a potential answer yourself,quite seems like scum pressuring other scum without intention to bus if you ask me. Is this a soft Of what? |
|
|
|
Post by motogp on Aug 13, 2018 8:56:49 GMT
Traitor gets osbp if not recruited according to the theme. I still don't understand why you asked a question while also mentioning a potential good answer at the same time,quite makes me think that you two are scum without daytalk. I townread OM due to his excessive contribution and helpfulness in the past days. Also statistically it's good to NL again,and allow a potential cop to give inspects so abstain from lynchingJust realized I misread your earlier post as "You are not even responding with a potential answer yourself." Regardless, I still don't see the issue with the fact that I am. "No one claimed it" is such a blatant cop-out response that I'm obviously going to want to hear more than just that from Xnad. If we're scumbuddies what motivation do I have to call that out in the first place? It would actually be "statistically good" for a Roleblocker (if we have one) to claim with their targets for the past 2 nights, especially if they targeted the same person both times. I'm assuming that none of the more "active" players are a Roleblocker since they'd have claimed it, which leaves Dasocks~ , Crespo , and bluegummybear . Until then I'm going to Vote: motogpFor some form of progress. Roleblockers must NOT claim,town just loses a clear even if we lynch scum today |
|
|
|
Post by Schiavetto ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪ on Aug 13, 2018 12:03:59 GMT
**Unlynch**
Like how your read on moto compares to the one on Dasocks ig. That's one of the things from my EoD posting yesterday; it's still valid. I don't know what you're saying here
|
|
