---TOWN--- (I changed my mind, was neutral at first before I wrote up the paragraph)
OM: I will admit, after the OM vs. AZ saga I had not really evaluated OM much. During said saga, I found it odd that OM got somewhat defensive and was unwilling to admit that Scorrch wasn't really entirely dismissed. Later, he kinda backtracked saying that he found it a
start to dismiss Scorrch, which is more reasonable (though I still don't think AZ's respective post is anything significant). I think I gave OM too much flack for keeping the discussion going, when he
did backtrack on it and it's valid to say that
Mafia would want to gradually discredit someone and admitted that he also wanted to stir conversation. Honestly, now that I've read back on this, I get much more towny vibes than I did beforehand. He did cause major progress in the game by doing this. I do still think that he read too much into the post, but that does not make him scum automatically.
Later, he supported the attack on Alex and I think he worded very nicely what is wrong with Alex right now (after just accusing him). Like with Quo, I feel like there was a good possibility to analyse my posts regarding Alex and how it was a bit strange, but he attacked Alex as well. Still, I heavily agree with the
posts describing Alex's behavior*, especially around that time.
Overall, I think OM has supported the town quite a bit this game and made a lot of progress overall. At first, I thought the saga with AZ was quite odd as he kept defending a stance I thought was nonsense, but as I said, it wasn't as bad as I'd thought. In the meantime, he did cause a lot of discussion, had good responses to people and clearly had active gameplay, which leads me to believe OM is also town right now (and I should've analysed him better before). I do feel like his reads have been selective - I'd like to see his reads on those he's not mentioned (me, quo, and past-start day 1 ani). I could understand it if he focuses on people he actively scumreads/finds reasons to scumread or wants to push, but it's useful to know townreads as well
and also for us to gauge how erratically your opinion would change.
*However, I'm not sure if Alex is scum or negtown. More on this in my Alex analysis.
---SCUM---
Alex: Alright, Alex. Alex is a player my read could be very volatile on. Obviously, yesterday I had my "plan" to over-exaggerate Alex's faults and hoped to spark some kind of discussion by that. I still stand by the idea of some of those arguments*. Still, as OM mentioned, Alex has been easily agitated, and has largely made posts that really do not say anything or defend his overall style of gameplay. It was fine for him to have a slow start - Ani had it too, but unlike Ani, Alex has not made up for it by later curiousness. I am honestly not sure if Alex is (neg)town who is having trouble adapting to this environment, or scum who does not want to engage (...and maybe also has trouble adapting to the environment), but he was a negative presence in the game nonetheless in Day 1. His
only real analytical posts came from being prompted, and afterwards he mostly defended his gameplay**. Then
his responses are just aggressive when people call him out, which is just... unpleasant really and not helpful at all.
Relatively short, as a lot has been said and he's largely done the same thing. As I said, Alex could have been negtown thus far, but I need him to step it up. Give some more reads, pursue the read on AZ further, etc. I'm very conflicted what I want to do with this slot - to me he's clearly been the worst presence yesterday, but I also honestly believe it could be negtown and hope for him to develop into a better spot. On the other hand, it is very possible that he is defensive scum, so I want to raise the pressure
Lynch Alex. Hopefully that gets us more knowledge on this front.
ScorrchingTheaph , you seem very confident that Alex is (neg)town. Why do you think this specifically? I am very conflicted. My head says Alex is scum and my heart says he's town.
*I just tried to push them in a strange way and added reasoning that wasn't really good.
**If you don't think you were defeatist, maybe I didn't use the right word. What I meant is that you seemed very discouraged by any argument against you, which made it seem like you would just actively stop trying to contribute to avoid that critique.
AZ: My lynch is definitely between Alex and AZ right now. The start of the game, with the AZ vs. OM saga was not too interesting. AZs post was nothing special, didn't particularly disregard Scorrch. Personally, I don't really know why
they'd withdraw their words, but I will assume it's to keep the start of the game friendly if Scorrch actually felt disregarded. In general, I don't think this argument around disregarding Scorrch means much wrt AZ. They kept calm and most people seemed to agree that AZ didn't really discredit Scorrch, so fair enough. The only thing I really want to mention here besides "can't get much out of it" is that I think (OM+AZ)!scum distancing seems unlikely to me. It seems rather odd that AZ would apologise, and OM would backtrack (to a less strong pov) yet keep insisting on his point. I feel like they'd have started less strongly?
For the start of the game, I'd like to know
quojova , what was the reason for the extremely early game town percentage points for AZ?
Then AZ starts sussing me, so I feel sort of awkward commenting on it, but I honestly feel like the push feels very strange. The first direct read is presented in
this post, where I think a valid point is presented*. The questions weren't necessarily very strong. Afterwards, there's no real contribution to get anything out of the remainder of the day. Apparently his inactivity / lack of contribution near the end of Day 1 was due to a migraine, so I will not hold this against him**.
Then, in
today's post, the read is "expanded" with the same argument. I don't like how this is simply said, when I have made many posts, that you should be able to provide some more detail if you want to start a push. Only the questions argument from before came with an example, and that is what the entire "fake scumhunting" thing is based on, when there's been many things I've done - it feels like it's all been deluded to one particular point that could be pushed. Especially since, AZ has not mentioned Quo, despite (IMO) having
a similar case of asking questions, my question is why the difference in treatment? I would like to know why almost all I did has been pointless**. It feels more like pushing an agenda than pushing from a real read, at least from the quality of the reasoning thus far.
The other points in AZs post seem very easy points to make. Alex is... definitely doing something strange, and Ani also seems like an easy target with the way that they do not seem fully confident in the game yet. These claims are pretty easy to make and seem like filler reads, in all honestly, while no reads have been presented on more active (and possibly respected) players, like Quo, Scorrch and OM***. So, I'm the only push of someone I'd consider more active so far. I did ask myself whether AZ!scum would push me, but I don't know why they wouldn't. AZ doesn't know me and I do think I've posted enough (and that it was a bit messy), such that arguments could be formed. For now, it all feels a bit fishy.
However, I am afraid that I am biased towards AZ****, because of their push on me. I've evaluated this and still came to the conclusion that I really have a bad feeling about the way AZ did their push still. I would like to ask
ScorrchingTheaph for their opinion on AZ especially, as you're reading me as scum now as well, and I would like your evaluation of their arguments and the way the push happened, from a less biased position. I will (try to) be open to critique on this argumentation, as if the consensus is that I'm spouting bullshit on a situation where a bias is likely, I'm willing to let it go lol. So please tell me if that's the case. For now, I get the most scummy feeling from AZ, especially since I get a towny feeling from many other players as of now and I do not get a particularly towny feel from AZ in any post. The push is a bit strange, the rest of Day 1 was rather NAI/mechanical, and that's basically all that's happened.
I do find the wagon onto AZ so far a bit strange*****, though. Alex's case is semi-clear for me but it's also clear that I do not feel like he's the strongest player so far. Ani's not expanded on their claim, I didn't notice this before and it's a bit of an oversight, but I do not like that I do not know what their push is based off and that's honestly kinda odd.
Animal Midwife , why the clear push onto AZ, seeing as how you were quick to lynch him today?
*I wasn't necessarily thinking I'd get a clear read from OM based on these questions alone, but did want to understand his line of thought for what he did, so I could judge how he plays better and be able to judge whether it was strange based on his reasoning, as it could be or could not be depending on his expanded answer (not just the yes / no).
**I'd also like to know what else he would have expected from me? I don't know what I should've analysed besides the saga, in all honestly. Do you feel like the analysis was worthwhile, but weak, or that it was weak to look at the saga in general?
***It does seem like they TR OM from the post responding to Scorrch, so that nuances it a bit.
****Especially since I do not get a real town feel anywhere, I'm somewhat afraid of a tunnel.
*****Kinda funny how now everyone who AZ sussed has spoken out against him though, with more or less arguments.
-----------------------------
This kinda makes me worry I'm leaning town on too many people
Also took too long to make this, so I will not do an in-depth view per person again I think, but this is fully where I am at right now. Would like especially to hear parts you disagree with