|
Post by OM~! on Feb 7, 2021 5:04:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 5:05:40 GMT
are you genuinely sad/disappointed about that?
|
|
|
Post by OM~! on Feb 7, 2021 5:09:23 GMT
hi it appears the streak of no deaths at night continue wdy stealing
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 5:09:46 GMT
so I didn't reread EoD2 over the night which I will need to do at some point
not in a super analysis-driven state of mind rn though so I might wait until tomorrow
yet again we can ask if anyone has a reason for a swap that is pro-town (seriously doubt I'll be voting no reward today though)
the thing about an rb that I thought about was if we assume the majority of scum to be factional killing it seems better to not discuss in-depth who we actually want to rb and instead give it to someone who we just generally trust... which is awkward
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 5:10:12 GMT
hi it appears the streak of no deaths at night continue wdy stealing what?
|
|
|
Post by OM~! on Feb 7, 2021 5:10:18 GMT
hi it appears the streak of no deaths at night continue wdy stealing *wyd
|
|
|
Post by OM~! on Feb 7, 2021 5:10:35 GMT
Fam, why u got the diamond, that was stolen?
|
|
|
Post by OM~! on Feb 7, 2021 5:11:56 GMT
Fam, why u got the diamond, that was stolen? nvm this is an angleshoot completely ignore this point
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 5:12:01 GMT
Fam, why u got the diamond, that was stolen? is this a flavor thing
|
|
|
Post by OM~! on Feb 7, 2021 5:13:04 GMT
Fam, why u got the diamond, that was stolen? is this a flavor thing I falsely assumed this was a mechanic
|
|
|
Post by OM~! on Feb 7, 2021 5:13:16 GMT
tl:dr, I'm an idiot
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 5:14:04 GMT
okie
|
|
|
Post by OM~! on Feb 7, 2021 5:17:50 GMT
Anyways, I was relying on this to pressure but uh I can't do that now so I'm going to have to regroup that LMAO chaostrodon! Hello! Fill us in on your thoughts on our slots, if you've been reading the thread
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 5:24:29 GMT
Anyways, I was relying on this to pressure but uh I can't do that now so I'm going to have to regroup that LMAO chaostrodon ! Hello! Fill us in on your thoughts on our slots, if you've been reading the thread was it just joke pressure? I don't see how if you thought it was anything reasonably substantive you wouldn't be allowed to share it
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 5:26:39 GMT
not really the most relevant thought for our thread but I was just thinking about how my understanding of the spiderz role - that he traps someone in a thread - sounds like such a distinctly non-town ability
also they've gotta figure out litt/dubz somehow
|
|
|
Post by OM~! on Feb 7, 2021 5:51:50 GMT
Anyways, I was relying on this to pressure but uh I can't do that now so I'm going to have to regroup that LMAO chaostrodon ! Hello! Fill us in on your thoughts on our slots, if you've been reading the thread was it just joke pressure? I don't see how if you thought it was anything reasonably substantive you wouldn't be allowed to share it it's distinctly a flavour thing, I believe, which I assume, throws it being substantive out of the window
|
|
|
Post by chaostrodon on Feb 7, 2021 16:00:37 GMT
Hi hi So these are my thoughts about the events on here People who sred Alex : This would include quo , om , az and lucas. I felt like there were a lot of emotions in yesterdays lynch and I find it hard to discern which ones were genuine and which where not , esp since this is a forum game and not chat. The crux of the matter seems to be that Alex seemed un-cooperative , rude and his reasons for AZ push was found to be lacking. Reading Alex's iso makes me agree with most of those points , but what I found puzzling is that people werent taking Alex's claim into account. Because that part was extremely believable. Quo provided an explanation saying he could be basing his town role claim on the scum role that was allotted to him but I dont find that satisfying. Imo alex shouldnt have been lynched after the claim , ofc he shouldnt have been tred simply for the claim but ideally he should have lived for a couple more days atleast . That would have given a lot more info since if the whole rift thing was a scum ability , scum would be forced to do something about him . I dont sr anyone on the alex wagon simply for this , but if anyone had gotten off at that point I would have tred them People who tred Alex : This would be Mr ? and animal midwife . Now I feel this is a bit problematic because both these slots gave the explanation that they thought Alex's emotions were genuine and they both also sred OM , which means they thought his emotions werent genuine. I felt like both OM and Alex were being quite emotional yesterday , and I would like an explanation why these people thought one was genuine and the other was scummy . People who tred scorrch : Lucas , Quo , OM and animal midwife. I could follow Lucas and Quo's reasonings (even tho I dont agree entirely) but I simply dont get the other two , especially animal midwife since she thought Mr ? was 'wolfy' on d1 but he became her top town read d2 , Where you so absolutely convinced by Quo and Lucas? . Also this post by OM , ps-mafia.proboards.com/post/74071 implies that he knows for sure that scorrch was town . What makes you so sure? D1 AZ-OM interactions : I made a post about this on d1 , where I said I found both sides on the interactions to be a little weird , with OM being chaotic and AZ being non-confrontational . Day 2 , both these slots are heavily charged against Alex . Tbh , this comes off a bit like s-s interactions to me , but lets see. Lucas : Lucas's thoughts seemed original and it was easy to follow with his line of reasoning inspite of the whole generating discussion fiasco . I would be inclined to townread him , but he comes across as a formidable player so I dont know if I could distinguish scum Lucas from the town one , What Im saying is I think Lucas is town but dont quote me on that Quojova : Quo has I feel had a lot of fresh takes and I dont find anything scummy in his iso , I would townlean him for now but not tr him entirely AZ : Apart from the initial interactions with OM , I cant read him off any other post . His d2 iso is almost entirely about Alex , which is understandable if he is indeed town , but I can see a good scum player faking the whole thing. For what its worth tho , his readlist seems quite similiar to mine In summary , I would townread Lucas , slightly townlean Quo , scorch is neutral , Az is a slight scumlean , OM is a slight scumlean too but more than AZ , and I would like for AM to clarify her thoughts on Mr ? and OM
|
|
|
Post by chaostrodon on Feb 7, 2021 16:09:28 GMT
Thoughts about the past thread:
Spiderz : His d2 was better than d1 but that alone doesnt atone for the tunnel on ptsd , which I have already said , seemed to be motivated by self preservation rather than a legit read
Dubz: I am fairly certain this slot is trying to buddy genny . I kept digging her about her opinion on genny and what I arrived at in the end was something like "Source : Trust me , bro"
Genny: Thoughtless vote on d1 and lots of filler
Funnily enough these three were the ones who sent me here
Litt and Maple : These people have vaguely claimed and I think we can give them the benefit of the doubt for now as there are other slots that seem scummier
Bgb : townlean because I liked a lot of his takes
|
|
|
Post by chaostrodon on Feb 7, 2021 16:11:21 GMT
I see quo suggested me to swap with Am , but I think the other thread needs someone who can generate discussion since they are voting to kill and we are voting for reward. If you think he is vital to this thread we can vote someone to exchange for him
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 16:19:35 GMT
I see quo suggested me to swap with Am , but I think the other thread needs someone who can generate discussion since they are voting to kill and we are voting for reward. If you think he is vital to this thread we can vote someone to exchange for him yea, I asked OM if he was genuinely sad or disappointed by that because it might increase the workload here but overall it's probably a sound move
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 16:27:15 GMT
Hi hi So these are my thoughts about the events on here People who sred Alex : This would include quo , om , az and lucas. I felt like there were a lot of emotions in yesterdays lynch and I find it hard to discern which ones were genuine and which where not , esp since this is a forum game and not chat. The crux of the matter seems to be that Alex seemed un-cooperative , rude and his reasons for AZ push was found to be lacking. Reading Alex's iso makes me agree with most of those points , but what I found puzzling is that people werent taking Alex's claim into account. Because that part was extremely believable. Quo provided an explanation saying he could be basing his town role claim on the scum role that was allotted to him but I dont find that satisfying. Imo alex shouldnt have been lynched after the claim , ofc he shouldnt have been tred simply for the claim but ideally he should have lived for a couple more days atleast . That would have given a lot more info since if the whole rift thing was a scum ability , scum would be forced to do something about him . I dont sr anyone on the alex wagon simply for this , but if anyone had gotten off at that point I would have tred them People who tred Alex : This would be Mr ? and animal midwife . Now I feel this is a bit problematic because both these slots gave the explanation that they thought Alex's emotions were genuine and they both also sred OM , which means they thought his emotions werent genuine. I felt like both OM and Alex were being quite emotional yesterday , and I would like an explanation why these people thought one was genuine and the other was scummy . People who tred scorrch : Lucas , Quo , OM and animal midwife. I could follow Lucas and Quo's reasonings (even tho I dont agree entirely) but I simply dont get the other two , especially animal midwife since she thought Mr ? was 'wolfy' on d1 but he became her top town read d2 , Where you so absolutely convinced by Quo and Lucas? . Also this post by OM , ps-mafia.proboards.com/post/74071 implies that he knows for sure that scorrch was town . What makes you so sure? D1 AZ-OM interactions : I made a post about this on d1 , where I said I found both sides on the interactions to be a little weird , with OM being chaotic and AZ being non-confrontational . Day 2 , both these slots are heavily charged against Alex . Tbh , this comes off a bit like s-s interactions to me , but lets see. Lucas : Lucas's thoughts seemed original and it was easy to follow with his line of reasoning inspite of the whole generating discussion fiasco . I would be inclined to townread him , but he comes across as a formidable player so I dont know if I could distinguish scum Lucas from the town one , What Im saying is I think Lucas is town but dont quote me on that Quojova : Quo has I feel had a lot of fresh takes and I dont find anything scummy in his iso , I would townlean him for now but not tr him entirely AZ : Apart from the initial interactions with OM , I cant read him off any other post . His d2 iso is almost entirely about Alex , which is understandable if he is indeed town , but I can see a good scum player faking the whole thing. For what its worth tho , his readlist seems quite similiar to mine In summary , I would townread Lucas , slightly townlean Quo , scorch is neutral , Az is a slight scumlean , OM is a slight scumlean too but more than AZ , and I would like for AM to clarify her thoughts on Mr ? and OM Still not really sure how to interact with claims in this game to be honest, and it might be something worth discussing. It just doesn't seem likely to me that this game which took so long to plan out collapses under the inability for scum to make reasonable fakeclaims. The other thing is, assuming scum is on a 3-4 person scumteam they would have the information from all those rolecards, with their various details, to try to compose something that fits with the game rather than just one rolecard. I do think it was weird that no one else seemed interested in seriously discussing the claim; given that it was definitely a point that pushed him more towards the town direction than the reverse. I don't think I would sl anyone off that though? -except maybe AZ. will need to recheck
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 16:31:21 GMT
What AZ just said is just very yikes. I think when I read this post my vote was kinda parked. It screamed desperation to me; Although what AZ said was probably more aggressive than warranted, nothing about it obviously screamed scum, and his inability to back up why it might indicate his alignment with any reasoning I thought was very scummy move
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 16:40:27 GMT
ig while I have the chance to do so, I will claim. I have 2 actions, the first of which I can use once per night, on one person. They will have their actions accelerated and will make it so their actions will happen at a higher priority than everyone else’s, on top of this they will also be immune to rift creation(whatever that is), and I can only target everyone once the whole game. I used this on scorch last night. My 2nd action I can only do once per game, and have not used it yet. If I use the ability I cannot use my other one that night. If I use it any player with a rift will travel to the other time period and the rift will be removed In my head, rift creation sounds like time-flavoured Arsonist douse, which would explain the lack of N1 kills. I think this is a real claim and a Town role. idk how relevant this is on scorr in particular but I play scum pretty safely where I can and I know I would never say this. Saying this I would feel pretty paranoid about what amount of knowledge would be deemed "reasonable inference" by the rest of the town, as well as to a lesser degree what they might do with that information. As in - what if the town turned on this post and went, "hold on, you inferred that the killing power might be arso-like a bit too quickly". I also think this post is not really the sort of thing people normally would townlean for so I don't really think it's some wifom maneuver to get towncred. do you guys agree? this isn't really something I know the general mindset of players well on so that cautiousness might only be a me thing
|
|
|
Post by chaostrodon on Feb 7, 2021 16:57:12 GMT
You are right , Thats a risky thing to say if rift creation was indeed similiar to arson and Mr ? was scum
|
|
|
Post by quojova on Feb 7, 2021 17:40:13 GMT
You are right , Thats a risky thing to say if rift creation was indeed similiar to arson and Mr ? was scum do you think it's meaningful at all as the source of a read/lean
|
|