lost myt post dammit, I think im off my game today, just feel meh. Anyway, I don't really get good vibes from aligning? gonna go through their iso chronologically since i feel like that makes sense to me
Section 1ck/pcb/fame reads (vade gets called null too)
parts i like
3rd point on ck is an actual reason why they like them that matches with the quote
parts i dont like
the quotes used dont really show what aligning is saying for the most part, and ngl aligning just doesnt make sense sometimes
going down the line
ck point 1
quote is of ck saying vade is a slow starter, and that twt's post isnt bad but nothing new
aligning says ck is trying to solve the game all the way through (
) and give thoughts and opinions on other slots (agreed)
ck point 2
quote is ck responding to my wallpost where i briefly said that ck gave me whiplash talking about how sc might be scum into talking about ice cream
what aligning said verbatim is
"This line here is addressing what NE and I think had a fair response. They did have a thought process seeing it from a SC townie perspective dropped the read which they made to engage in converssation and gives off townie vibes."
i don't understand what the fuck any of this means? If I understand what they're saying right, they're saying that dropping the sc read is townie, but I don't understand why
pcb
alignings read on pcb comes from pcb putting pressure on vade's slot. I find that reasoning questionable, but my bigger question is why they decided to focus on that, when I feel like there's other pcb content that i would call eye-catching, at least more so than the vade pressure
fame 1
not gonna bother explaining the quote its taking too long. I dont think its bad just meh but i didnt feel like making a neutral category just for this, I dont really understand how motive plays into it, but fame questioning me on my fenrir read is fine, its one of the 'key posts' that i feel fame's made
fame 2
quote doesnt match with what aligning is saying imo
quote-"like the issue w/ ck's super early posts is yeah they look designed to generate townreads on themselves & i think that's a real read that could come from pcb/anyone else calling it lamist-y
but i can't shake the feeling they're posting from a town pov bc of how 'objective' they're trying to be by looking at the game in third person/from the pov of others lol"
aligning-"Also a good address to their read on CK and has a townie solving process and makes sense as well. I follow through with their read here on Ck as well."
the first part of the sentence is fine, personally don't see fame's post as much of a
process, but will give that the benefit of the doubt. However, could just be me but the phrase 'follow through' there is just
weird in a way i don't like.
Section 2The interactions with turt
ps-mafia.proboards.com/post/132329/threadit's similar to ck saying the post was not bad but nothing special except uses more words and makes less sense.
Issues:
I don't get what makes them say turt is elaborating on their read on prod, when turt basically said "I get t!prod vibes but I suck at reading prod and i town players with high presence", I don't see how that's elaboration
That's really it, I don't feel like I can say anything about the turt-vade interactions because I don't feel like finding them
ps-mafia.proboards.com/post/132337/threadnothing egregious, but it feels a little harsh on turt for something they say is neither scummy or townie. sets up the next post
ps-mafia.proboards.com/post/132497/threadjust gonna analyze what aligning said
a)"Theres several lines here like they have only read like two posts of mine when there 3 attached and turt hasnt said anything too meaningful outside those attached posts."
first part about 3 attached not 2 feels like a nitpick.
second part, i think aligning's saying that those are the only 3 turt posts that matter, which feels harsh again to turt
b) "And turts final arguement is that they could scum read vade and most their arguement being about pmeta and not really address vades first point or even addressing what I said about turt before vade came in and said something similar."
i dont really understand this so im just gonna take it from the pmeta angle
vade's second and third quotes are turt saying that ck/pcb feel unpaired and that ck/peng seemed contrived
vade says turt seems to be relying on a lot of pmeta, which i disagree with if we're just talking from the quotes. The quotes don't really have any reasoning that's based on it being ck/pcb/peng. if vade's just talking about turts posts as a whole ignore this (invitation for vade to clarify)
turt responds saying he didnt use a lot of pmeta in one of the multiple sentences of his post
aligning claims that most of turt's argument comes from pmeta?
maybe im just horribly confused what people mean and am taking this too far.
and that's really it, im thirsty and tired and i feel really stupid for making another wallpost but here it is