|
|
Post by VigilanteVigoroth on Feb 24, 2015 6:49:40 GMT
rssp1 I think the no claiming your role PM means quoting as in OC Mafia, @citrus freak the story's have nothing to do with the role, and everyone, I didn't properly read the death thing I just saw who died, and I assumed that Znaq was town, also, what's OMGUS anyway?
|
|
|
|
Post by VigilanteVigoroth on Feb 24, 2015 6:50:20 GMT
|
|
Stir
Villager
An Alien Tree from Mars™
Posts: 64
|
Post by Stir on Feb 24, 2015 7:27:41 GMT
Yeah. Its weird. I have serious problems with TheWhoDoctor not full claiming at this point. The only reason for to not full claim is to keep some wiggle room to change the claim later, and I think its a huge scumtell. I agree.
When he fully claims, I'll be fine with lynching :x
|
|
|
|
Post by rssp1 on Feb 24, 2015 8:12:00 GMT
@mob Boss can we have a clarification on what the exact rule for role pm claiming is?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spieky on Feb 24, 2015 14:47:02 GMT
> @mob Boss
|
|
macle
Innocent Child
Posts: 96 
|
Post by macle on Feb 24, 2015 17:59:20 GMT
Its just why post "i know who killed odm" instead of i'm watcher i got pikacal visiting odm last night? but then again, its TWD... also nice active game y/n
|
|
|
|
Post by pikacal on Feb 24, 2015 19:07:48 GMT
holy shit everything happens when I'm away or asleep doesn't it. I claim Sherlock Holmes, and yes, I did target ODM last night. He targeted no one.
|
|
|
|
Post by pikacal on Feb 24, 2015 19:10:38 GMT
Also, I'm unsure about the role claiming thing too, and seeing as no one can highlight Mob Boss , I will. mob clarifications are needed pl0x |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 19:50:27 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 19:50:44 GMT
Agck, sorry ODM.
|
|
|
|
Post by VigilanteVigoroth on Feb 24, 2015 19:53:12 GMT
Thanks for the HL citrus, I am on a phone rn, so I can't bold to lynch, will make a new post to do that, but I am a watcher, and I am clueso, I found out that rssp1 and @katos123 both targeted micc |
|
|
|
Post by VigilanteVigoroth on Feb 24, 2015 19:53:30 GMT
I am sure they can confirm this when they come on
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 20:00:08 GMT
rssp1, @katos123, is this true? We need you guys to check out his alibi. And geez people stop revealing, especially if you're an inspection role! Why are all the inspection roles outing now...!
|
|
|
|
Post by micc on Feb 24, 2015 20:38:49 GMT
it doesn't check out at all. As a watcher TheWhoDoctor would have seen PikaCal tracking ODM and someone else killing ODM. The speculation and random people outing their abilities is silly. TheWhoDoctor needs to claim his role. |
|
|
|
Post by VigilanteVigoroth on Feb 24, 2015 20:40:43 GMT
so either Pikacal or TWD is scum? Dad still using computer
|
|
|
|
Post by micc on Feb 24, 2015 20:48:58 GMT
not necessarily.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheWhoDoctor on Feb 24, 2015 21:21:46 GMT
I'm L the tracker, and PikaCal visited ODM last night.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 21:47:33 GMT
it doesn't check out at all. As a watcher TheWhoDoctor would have seen PikaCal tracking ODM and someone else killing ODM. The speculation and random people outing their abilities is silly. TheWhoDoctor needs to claim his role. *facepalm Sorry. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 21:58:58 GMT
Yeah. Its weird. I have serious problems with TheWhoDoctor not full claiming at this point. The only reason for to not full claim is to keep some wiggle room to change the claim later, and I think its a huge scumtell. I think this just happened: I'm L the tracker, and PikaCal visited ODM last night. And besides... I'll claim L. ODM was visited by PikaCal last night. ...This is clearly language a watcher would use. And what did she mean by "I'll claim..."? If she was so confident about accusing PikaCal, then wouldn't she be more adamant and clear in her choice of words? Like, "I claim tracker, PikaCal visited ODM last night." Instead she slowly revealed more and more information as we 'acclimated' to her claim. Unlynch Vigilante Vigoroth (I'm vacillating like a drunk Jimmy Carter) Lynch TheWhoDoctor |
|
|
|
Post by TheWhoDoctor on Feb 24, 2015 22:04:53 GMT
Yeah. Its weird. I have serious problems with TheWhoDoctor not full claiming at this point. The only reason for to not full claim is to keep some wiggle room to change the claim later, and I think its a huge scumtell. I think this just happened: I'm L the tracker, and PikaCal visited ODM last night. And besides... I'll claim L. ODM was visited by PikaCal last night. ...This is clearly language a watcher would use. And what did she mean by "I'll claim..."? If she was so confident about accusing PikaCal, then wouldn't she be more adamant and clear in her choice of words? Like, "I claim tracker, PikaCal visited ODM last night." Instead she slowly revealed more and more information as we 'acclimated' to her claim. Unlynch Vigilante Vigoroth (I'm vacillating like a drunk Jimmy Carter) Lynch TheWhoDoctor
First things first: >mfw "she" I'm very much a dude, thanks. Second: You want stronger, more confident and adamant language? I am L. Last night, I followed PikaCal and found that he visited ODM. Do with this info what you wish. Third: Why lynch me? I'm claiming an investigative role. Even if I'm lying, which, frankly, I'm not, (them commas) it would be stupid to lynch an investigative role with no CCs whatsoever. |
|
|
|
Post by Rabac on Feb 24, 2015 23:01:46 GMT
I think this just happened:And besides......This is clearly language a watcher would use. And what did she mean by "I'll claim..."? If she was so confident about accusing PikaCal, then wouldn't she be more adamant and clear in her choice of words? Like, "I claim tracker, PikaCal visited ODM last night." Instead she slowly revealed more and more information as we 'acclimated' to her claim. Unlynch Vigilante Vigoroth (I'm vacillating like a drunk Jimmy Carter) Lynch TheWhoDoctor
First things first: >mfw "she" I'm very much a dude, thanks. Second: You want stronger, more confident and adamant language? I am L. Last night, I followed PikaCal and found that he visited ODM. Do with this info what you wish. Third: Why lynch me? I'm claiming an investigative role. Even if I'm lying, which, frankly, I'm not, (them commas) it would be stupid to lynch an investigative role with no CCs whatsoever. I think he really tried to take advantage of that wiggle room, because the second you pointed out there was a flaw in the logic, he instantly changed his watcher sounding claim to tracker. I actually agree with what Citrus said about word choice. Cuz ive found scum who used words that were not assertive enough, which made me feel that they were not sure of the claim. And if you arent sure of what you are saying why claim it. But Gee, you sure sound sure that you know who killed ODM. Probably because you killed ODM. Because if you were tracker, you would know that your role is only limited to seeing who a player visits, but you dont see all the people that visited that player. So, if you were tracker, you would know there was some margin of error holy shit everything happens when I'm away or asleep doesn't it. I claim Sherlock Holmes, and yes, I did target ODM last night. He targeted no one. Also I think this counts as a cc by Pikacal, made b4 u even claimed tracker. Im more inclined to believe Pikacal rn, so my lynch on you is not gonna change. |
|
|
|
Post by TheWhoDoctor on Feb 25, 2015 0:23:24 GMT
Suit yourself Rabbac, but didn't Mob Boss say there wouldn't be cops but there would be other investigative roles? Watcher and Tracker in the same game make sense. I do recognize that other player's could have visited ODM, so I apologize for jumping the gun and assuming that I got lucky and that the player I follow visited the person who died, and that that automatically made them mafia. However, I still think lynching a claimed investigative role without a CC is a mislead lynch.
|
|
|
|
Post by rssp1 on Feb 25, 2015 0:37:31 GMT
I can verify what VigilanteVigoroth said.
unlynch VigilanteVigoroth
|
|
|
|
Post by rssp1 on Feb 25, 2015 0:39:30 GMT
for myself, anyways.
TWD, explain why you switched from "ODM was visited by Pikacal" to "Pikacal was visited by ODM."
|
|
|
|
Post by rssp1 on Feb 25, 2015 0:41:12 GMT
Lynch: TheWhoDoctor
You aren't making sense. It seems like you keep switching between a tracker and a watcher claim, or you're just ignoring PikaCal's claim.
|
|
Pow! You've been hit by a smooth criminal!