|
|
Post by Rabac on Feb 23, 2015 18:12:47 GMT
Seriously man, I agree with everyone here, full claim. Bc you will prob get killed by maf in the night. This may be crucial evidence as to winning us the game. I will also put out there that he could be fakeclaiming an inspecting role, esp. since dont have any cops according to Mob Boss, yet we have characters that can supposedly inspect (ie: Insector Clueso). Mob Boss did say that he would give the scum a role that sounds townie. Put 1 and 1 together and I think you can see where I'm going with this. Imo we cant 100% trust any inspect claims, and even if we follow these inspect claims, we wont know if maf is leading us astray, since this is no reveal CS, and forcing a follow the cop on us. So Idk if I 100% trust TWD, and holding out on his inspect doesnt help his case imo. Meh imma lynch for now. Might get off TWD later, we'll see. Lynch TWDThis isnt to say that I trust VigilanteVigoroth 100%, but my gut says that TWD is wrong, and imma trust my gut on this one |
|
|
|
Post by pikacal on Feb 23, 2015 19:19:20 GMT
In relation to this, we shouldn't be revealing if we don't know who is who or if we got good information or not. Even then, for example, if odm was doc and our tracker or something found a good trail, it may be extremely risky to go ahead and reveal. We would literally just be leaving ourselves up to death. Probably not making this as clear as possible or typing this like what i was thinking. tl;dr, don't reveal imo unless we have a situation where it's beneficial. Thoughts on this sort of thing? Just wondering what you guys thought on this subject. I mean we're all a power role pretty much, cept from that villy claim, so I don't see the point in claiming, at least this early in the game. (Also, this is kind of not entirely in relation to that, but I thought that was probably the best bit to throw in this.) , if you know who killed incognito, then soft claiming like you did is the worst thing you can do because you will be killed before you can reveal. If you know who killed him, then out right now or your death will be in vain. In that situation, definitely full claim. That's what I sorta meant. Basically my tl;dr. As everyone said, full claim. I'm not lynching without knowing how you know. |
|
|
|
Post by VigilanteVigoroth on Feb 23, 2015 19:22:47 GMT
Woah, woah, micc, WTF did i do, you have just been bandwagoning for the past 2 days with 0 evidence Lynch micc |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 19:43:54 GMT
Woah, woah, micc, WTF did i do, you have just been bandwagoning for the past 2 days with 0 evidence Lynch miccOMGUS much? You instantly assumed Znaquasa was innocent after reading the death reports. Why would you assume that? ODM's report showed him fighting against an oppressive government, and scum usually do not die in the night. So why was Znaq's death so different when ODM's? That fact alone makes me pretty sure Znaq was scum even though we didn't get a reveal. That's also the reason I did a 180 170 135(?) on my opinion of micc. And micc has been lynch leading not bandwagoning. |
|
|
|
Post by TheWhoDoctor on Feb 23, 2015 20:00:14 GMT
Don't hammer anyone yet, but I'd like a claim from PikaCal, along with what action you used.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 21:22:13 GMT
This is NOC. He can't PM you personally. But if you're saying PikaCal did it, then Unlynch Vigilante Vigoroth, Lynch PikaCal
|
|
|
|
Post by TheWhoDoctor on Feb 23, 2015 21:40:14 GMT
I'm saying PikaCal visited ODM.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 21:57:46 GMT
Claim your full role to clarify this, role name and all so we know of your certainty, and that you're not just making this up.
If you're watcher and you targeted ODM, then that's confirmed evidence, but if you're tracker and went on PikaCal, then there's still a bit of room for error.
|
|
|
|
Post by micc on Feb 23, 2015 22:13:24 GMT
Re: TheWhoDoctor claim
My thoughts mirror cirtus freak's. TWD, youve made yourself a target regardless. Its time to full claim.
Re: VigilanteVigoroth
Citrus freak once again has it right (except for the putting meaning into flavor part - thats just silly). I voted you because a) the "lynched a townie" statement was a possible scum slip, and b) to see what type of reaction you would have.
That reaction was somewhat defensive and it rather blatantly misrepresents what my play has been this game, so definitely thinking the vote is in a good spot.
@vigilantevigoroth: Why did you choose to react to my vote and not the other two players who voted you?
|
|
|
|
Post by rssp1 on Feb 23, 2015 22:39:16 GMT
micc, fairly certain i'm the only other one who voted him.
|
|
|
|
Post by rssp1 on Feb 23, 2015 22:39:38 GMT
never mind, I missed citrus's post.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 23:01:58 GMT
VigilanteVigoroth is @ splashattacklol without the space. Yeah, the main reason we lynched you was because you spoke of him being town with such certainty. Nothing is absolute unless the mod says it--and the mod didn't reveal the role at all, which is why it's so strange you were sure he was town. I still think flavoring has something to do with it, but that's just me. So, for now, I think the best course of action is a pikacal lynch after (if) TheWhoDoctor fullclaims, and if TheWhoDoctor actually cannot fullclaim, then that's a confirmed scum. Then I say we target VigilanteVigoroth.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 23:03:01 GMT
Edit: I meant to say, the flavoring was the main reason I lynched you, but the certainty part was why they lynched you.
|
|
|
|
Post by micc on Feb 23, 2015 23:08:41 GMT
The stories have nothing to do with the game, just for fun. So yeah, this isn't a flavor game. Citrus stop being silly. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 1:49:42 GMT
He could be just saying that!
I have dreams too
|
|
macle
Innocent Child
Posts: 96 
|
Post by macle on Feb 24, 2015 2:26:25 GMT
i'll post my thoughts tomorrow / later tonight. im studying for my abnormal psych exam thats tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheWhoDoctor on Feb 24, 2015 3:16:20 GMT
I'll claim L. ODM was visited by PikaCal last night.
|
|
|
|
Post by micc on Feb 24, 2015 3:42:07 GMT
:/
Being weird about claiming isnt going to help us get this right.
Pikacal, did you visit ODM last night?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 3:49:11 GMT
Claim your full darn role, geez. Well, L is a legitimate claim for a watcher. TheWhoDoctor clearly said 'was visited by' so she's a watcher, unless she's just feeling lying and that's a half-butted claim. If you visited ODM last night, say you did so now. Especially pikacal. |
|
|
|
Post by Fort Colorcastle on Feb 24, 2015 4:00:16 GMT
Citrus said a sub was needed. Do you still need a sub? If you do, I can sub.
|
|
macle
Innocent Child
Posts: 96
|
Post by macle on Feb 24, 2015 4:07:52 GMT
i think its strange how TWD claimed that he is watcher and Pikacal killed ODM. Why not just say that in the first post? but atm its our only lead atm unless we get other info.
|
|
|
|
Post by micc on Feb 24, 2015 4:23:40 GMT
Yeah. Its weird.
I have serious problems with TheWhoDoctor not full claiming at this point. The only reason for to not full claim is to keep some wiggle room to change the claim later, and I think its a huge scumtell.
|
|
|
|
Post by rssp1 on Feb 24, 2015 4:59:59 GMT
I checked the rules and I think he's not full claiming because of the rule stating that you can't share your role pm.
|
|
|
|
Post by micc on Feb 24, 2015 5:59:15 GMT
If claiming a role is against the rules I'm replacing out and never coming back.
|
|
|
|
Post by rssp1 on Feb 24, 2015 6:47:04 GMT
not claiming a role, but pasting the role pm. That's what I understood from it. I recommend reading it for yourself to make sure what I thought it is is correct.
|
|
Pow! You've been hit by a smooth criminal!
