|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Feb 7, 2020 17:25:04 GMT
On the topic of RVS, can flushie and small vote for someone pls. You can vote NL if you really want to but not voting anyone shows a level of hesitation that I don't want to see in my friendly neighbourhood forum game. yeah sorry for flood but multi-ing on mobile is a bitch do forgive me pls ty. vote claireI realize the more I read this the more I get ticked off by it. |
|
myo!
Watcher
~i keep it juicy juicy, i eat that lunch~
Posts: 124
|
Post by myo! on Feb 7, 2020 17:39:36 GMT
I mean ok
Claire r u town? </3
|
|
|
|
Post by Claire on Feb 7, 2020 17:57:18 GMT
ngl this doesnt really make sense to me? NL should never be an option and why are you so insistent on forcing others to participate in RVS? More precisely, why is NL an option if your goal is to force the nonvoters to place a vote? NL is a bad option, but anyone who did it can then be questioned as a method of moving the game forward. I'm "insistent on forcing others" to vote as early game RVSes and wagons can provide a lot of information - better to start things off with something even if it's nothing substantial. I mean ok Claire r u town? </3 yeah <3 also anyone scumreading me for my "es discard is scummy" comment isn't paying enough attention to the discards |
|
|
|
Post by ZestOfLife on Feb 7, 2020 18:05:03 GMT
Sloppy Votecounter 1.2
Abdel (1) - Arctina
Claire (2) - micromorphic, Xnadrojx
ForgotToFlush (2) - Fenrir, Edjeanearions
Arctina (1) - Claire
Not Voting (7) - abdel, gimm1ck, epicsnorlax, AlmostZero, ForgotToFlush, smallworldz, Alexander489
With 13 alive, it takes 7 votes to hammer. |
|
|
|
|
Post by smallworldz on Feb 7, 2020 18:26:29 GMT
FBI agent is town aligned So if you picked FBI agent as your ALIGNMENT (not role) You'd say that your alignment is FBI agent (which is town) Someone else who picked FBI agent as their alignment/role would then cc thus revealing one scum Yeah I realized you meant it this way after I posted. Still don't think it would help at all actually. Statistically speaking the scum wre going to find safeclaims, whether be it they chose a town role as their role, their role provides them indirect info (like lovers), or just straight up betting on a claim being safe because in all likelihood, 30 roles went out and out of like 160 cards, thats something I'm willing to bet on. Rather, claiming would just lead to people making false positives because god knows how skilled people can be when it comes to ignoring obvious flaws in logic when it aligns with what they want to believe and selfish as it seems, I don't want to be the one to have to deal with that. Regarding numbers, I'm fairly sure we werent suplosed to know our numbers so ZestOfLife whats the protocol here? do we just not claim numbers? or do we move on with this game changing twist? *39 roles went out out of 146 roles However more importantly is that there are only 87 town cards, most of these are unique discards (there is only one of these roles in the deck I dont really see there being any safeclaim, especially if in the future they reveal their roleclaim eg scum claim their alignment is tracker and their role is mafia goon (whilst discarding another town role) Town would pick tracker as their alignment and the discarded role as their alignment |
|
|
|
Post by ZestOfLife on Feb 7, 2020 18:38:18 GMT
FBI agent is town aligned So if you picked FBI agent as your ALIGNMENT (not role) You'd say that your alignment is FBI agent (which is town) Someone else who picked FBI agent as their alignment/role would then cc thus revealing one scum Yeah I realized you meant it this way after I posted. Still don't think it would help at all actually. Statistically speaking the scum wre going to find safeclaims, whether be it they chose a town role as their role, their role provides them indirect info (like lovers), or just straight up betting on a claim being safe because in all likelihood, 30 roles went out and out of like 160 cards, thats something I'm willing to bet on. Rather, claiming would just lead to people making false positives because god knows how skilled people can be when it comes to ignoring obvious flaws in logic when it aligns with what they want to believe and selfish as it seems, I don't want to be the one to have to deal with that. Regarding numbers, I'm fairly sure we werent suplosed to know our numbers so ZestOfLife whats the protocol here? do we just not claim numbers? or do we move on with this game changing twist? Yeah you're not suppose to claim your role number |
|
myo!
Watcher
~i keep it juicy juicy, i eat that lunch~
Posts: 124
|
Post by myo! on Feb 7, 2020 20:11:36 GMT
thank you zol, very cool  now can we get some more posts on this thread going reading is hard when there's only 2 people you can really read |
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Feb 7, 2020 21:46:30 GMT
Gonna take more time to respond when I finish work, but fear not. I’ve developed opinions.  |
|
|
|
Post by gimm1ck on Feb 7, 2020 21:53:08 GMT
See I was going to post a general edgy joke about something to be able to rvs yesterday but then I realized it was 2am and I needed to sleep
I’m on mobile now and am at work until 10 but - some things Claire said give off feelings of scum attempting to earn free brownie points by fillering in some mishmash about ‘everyone should be voting’
Then again I might be tired but Xnad’s intro seems Townie enough for me, to a much lesser extent smallworldz gives off town feelings from that one post he made in regards to revealing alignments (I cba to get quotes on mobile)
So I’m going to lynch claire hooray for memorizing bold commands on mobile
|
|
|
|
Post by smallworldz on Feb 7, 2020 21:57:35 GMT
vote fenrir
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander489 on Feb 8, 2020 0:22:52 GMT
ROXXANE
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander489 on Feb 8, 2020 0:23:27 GMT
aight none of this is worth reading
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander489 on Feb 8, 2020 0:24:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by AlmostZero on Feb 8, 2020 1:28:09 GMT
On the topic of RVS, can flushie and small vote for someone pls. You can vote NL if you really want to but not voting anyone shows a level of hesitation that I don't want to see in my friendly neighbourhood forum game. I get the fact that you dislike hesitation in games, but having to compulsively vote someone within the first few posts into the game..? RVS'ing when you don't know how to RVS is more or less pointless, saying "I'm voting for you bc RVS" literally defeats the point of RVS |
|
|
|
Post by AlmostZero on Feb 8, 2020 1:31:29 GMT
or if you meant what base role you picked for the alignment, its literally pointless because lying and fabricating is too easy in this case. It's more of a "playing on the odds", they're hoping that two people (one scum, one town) claim the same role they picked for their alignment Not like I don't think it's pointless; there's 13 people in the game and there's 12 VTs in the GI role list. The odds are abysmal. We'll end up creating a discussion that will go nowhere |
|
|
|
Post by AlmostZero on Feb 8, 2020 1:47:34 GMT
More precisely, why is NL an option if your goal is to force the nonvoters to place a vote? NL is a bad option, but anyone who did it can then be questioned as a method of moving the game forward. I'm "insistent on forcing others" to vote as early game RVSes and wagons can provide a lot of information - better to start things off with something even if it's nothing substantial. also anyone scumreading me for my "es discard is scummy" comment isn't paying enough attention to the discards You first gave NL as a proper alternative, as one of the options that town can pick, and now you're implying that we should push people who nl? And I'm not sure how the cop discard makes them scummy? Is it because you discarded cop too? |
|
|
|
Post by AlmostZero on Feb 8, 2020 1:47:57 GMT
Lynch Claire
Meant to do this in the previous post, sorry for flooding
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Feb 8, 2020 1:49:12 GMT
good morning i just woke up and barely a page got posted, cmon people you gotta be more active than this.
"anyone scumreading me for saying es discard isnt paying enough attention to discards"
oh boy this just sounds so much worse. No one was scumreading you, I asked you why Cop discard was scummy but apparently you're paying too much attention to discards to pay attention to the thread. When all you've been doing is throwing out filler content and baseless shade, the least you could do is respond properly instead of this excuse of a deflect, y'know?
|
|
|
|
Post by AlmostZero on Feb 8, 2020 1:50:21 GMT
See I was going to post a general edgy joke about something to be able to rvs yesterday but then I realized it was 2am and I needed to sleep I’m on mobile now and am at work until 10 but - some things Claire said give off feelings of scum attempting to earn free brownie points by fillering in some mishmash about ‘everyone should be voting’ Then again I might be tired but Xnad’s intro seems Townie enough for me, to a much lesser extent smallworldz gives off town feelings from that one post he made in regards to revealing alignments (I cba to get quotes on mobile) So I’m going to lynch claire hooray for memorizing bold commands on mobile Eh I can't say the same abt smallworldz, they're just applying basic logic/spewing facts, which is more of a NAI/scumlean, mostly bc they haven't made any read themselves yet |
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Feb 8, 2020 1:54:57 GMT
More precisely, why is NL an option if your goal is to force the nonvoters to place a vote? NL is a bad option, but anyone who did it can then be questioned as a method of moving the game forward. I'm "insistent on forcing others" to vote as early game RVSes and wagons can provide a lot of information - better to start things off with something even if it's nothing substantial Firstly, not when NL is an option, because if anyone NLs because of your suggestion, your head is going on the chopping block along with theirs. It also doesn't work when you try to force it like this, RVS can and should end the moment something worth discussing happens, and forcing it like this is pretty counterproductive. Honestly, that entire bit read to me like trying to throw out fake content, fake helpful, and I don't like it. How about you start playing properly and answer why is the es discard scummy. |
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Feb 8, 2020 1:55:23 GMT
ayy someone else is online. talk to me about your reads pls im lonely
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Feb 8, 2020 1:56:30 GMT
I just realized claire might have meant it as a joke and im fucking stupid.
doesnt change the fact that she's still scum but uh, fuck now im embarassed
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Feb 8, 2020 2:00:16 GMT
alright ignore everything I said about discards it never happened imsorryclaireplsdonthurtme
Alex there are a lot of things to read come back, more talk is always good.
|
|
|
|
Post by smallworldz on Feb 8, 2020 2:02:55 GMT
Cop discard seems scummy since there isnt alot of other strong roles in the game
Also If they got 3 town cards it would be best to put the first strongest as your role,and then the 2nd strongest as your alignment to avoid looking scummy
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Feb 8, 2020 2:03:40 GMT
y'know claire is still scummy for the RVS comment but like, jesus that bandwagon gained traction a hella lot faster than I expected. Is no one going to jump to her defense or play the devils advocate or anything? It's kind of uncomfortable how easily claire got like 5 votes in a 7maj game, especially knowing how reluctant you guys are at getting anywhere near maj. ZestOfLife votecount pls |
|
