|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 2, 2017 15:51:25 GMT
Since you asked by the way:
"Am I WW now Fenrir?" Well I don't have a reason to rule it out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 2, 2017 16:02:53 GMT
You're actually nowhere near clear of being Mafia either, so why bother trying to clear yourself with that?
|
|
|
|
Post by clc ironic on Aug 2, 2017 16:08:17 GMT
aside from trying to defend town from losing, what else should I be doing...clearly no one is going to listen so if town wants to let lyncher win that's great
i'm trying my best so that the lyncher DOESNT win
anyway cop is probably some guy who is afk/doesnt want to claim (pls) thats the only two options
|
|
|
|
Post by RADicate on Aug 2, 2017 16:12:33 GMT
Gonna hold my lynch tbh, cosby already has plurality right now, no reason to qh. Real cop should cc if there is another cop claim to be had here. But if no cop claim does come i'll lynch cosby near the DL. A lyncher win doesnt even neccesarily equate to a town loss (granted it def doesnt help us but... the pros outwiegh the cons here imo), and if no cc odds of this being the actual cop are pretty high. So im confortable with this lynch, unless we get a legitimate believable cop cc
|
|
|
|
Post by clc ironic on Aug 2, 2017 16:18:09 GMT
Gonna hold my lynch tbh, cosby already has plurality right now, no reason to qh. To qh? Who ever said to qh at l-3?... Real cop should cc if there is another cop claim to be had here. Probably afk But if no cop claim does come i'll lynch cosby near the DL. Literally that's like saying I'll just ride this lynch through (what is the point of lynching me near the fucking DL) A lyncher win doesnt even neccesarily equate to a town loss (granted it def doesnt help us but... the pros outwiegh the cons here imo), and if no cc odds of this being the actual cop are pretty high. So im confortable with this lynch, unless we get a legitimate believable cop cc Nice and useless quote right here rad --> scumlean |
|
|
|
Post by RADicate on Aug 2, 2017 20:08:41 GMT
Gonna hold my lynch tbh, cosby already has plurality right now, no reason to qh. To qh? Who ever said to qh at l-3?... Real cop should cc if there is another cop claim to be had here. Probably afk But if no cop claim does come i'll lynch cosby near the DL. Literally that's like saying I'll just ride this lynch through (what is the point of lynching me near the fucking DL) A lyncher win doesnt even neccesarily equate to a town loss (granted it def doesnt help us but... the pros outwiegh the cons here imo), and if no cc odds of this being the actual cop are pretty high. So im confortable with this lynch, unless we get a legitimate believable cop cc Nice and useless quote right here rad --> scumlean Nobody ever said to QH, but i have played a total of two other forums games (well two NOCs anyways) and on one of them we have had a couple people just turboed and we wasted valuable discussion time. A person who got inspected as mafia could very well wind up getting suffering that fate. And if im being honest, i thought you were a lot closer to hammer than L-3 (i didnt go back and count). And apparently giving my opinions on what we should be doing is actually useless? By that logic anyone who has ever supported a lynch is scummy and getting behind a lynch is useless. Since this is only L-3 though lynch daddy cosby |
|
|
|
Post by Hawkie on Aug 2, 2017 20:38:10 GMT
I was planning on pushing Zest from the beginning but decided to sidetrack and lynch toni for a bit in the hopes of waking them up
I think a lot of champ's content is original enough that I'll stray away from him for now. ZOL is my firmest scumread at this point but if we're confident cseel isn't Lyncher I'll happily lynch scum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hawkie on Aug 2, 2017 20:39:47 GMT
That was @ fenrir's questions btw didn't realise there was another page of posts
|
|
|
|
Post by clc ironic on Aug 2, 2017 21:09:06 GMT
Nice and useless quote right here rad --> scumlean Nobody ever said to QH, but i have played a total of two other forums games (well two NOCs anyways) and on one of them we have had a couple people just turboed and we wasted valuable discussion time. A person who got inspected as mafia could very well wind up getting suffering that fate. And if im being honest, i thought you were a lot closer to hammer than L-3 (i didnt go back and count). And apparently giving my opinions on what we should be doing is actually useless? By that logic anyone who has ever supported a lynch is scummy and getting behind a lynch is useless. Since this is only L-3 though lynch daddy cosbynice and pointless. radicate is scum |
|
|
|
Post by clc ironic on Aug 2, 2017 21:10:01 GMT
you realize there is no point of continuing lynching me --- some afk guy is probably cop and chatterseel got lucky af
|
|
|
|
Post by VigilanteVigoroth on Aug 2, 2017 22:11:51 GMT
Deadline!Daddy Cosby/Ironicninja (4) @chatterseel Bomb Moss Fenrir RADicate Swallala/Chatterseel (1) clc ironic Kind Kangaroo Killer/Zestoflife (1) Hawkie Shanice the unicorn/Tonithesadthing (0)Queen Erotica/Champ1604 (0) Snakemaster69/Hawkie (0)No lynch (0)Fenrir (0)Uberdogedriver/XnadrojX (0)Bored6886 (0)The Great Gatsby/RADicate (0)
Not Voting (4) ZestOfLife Crespo Champ1604 BoredGames Daddy cosby was lynched!They were the
Mafia Goon
Day 2.5! Deadline is in 71 hours and 53 minutesNo lynch (0)Swallala/Chatterseel (0) Kind Kangaroo Killer/Zestoflife (0) Shanice the unicorn/Tonithesadthing (0)Queen Erotica/Champ1604 (0) Snakemaster69/Hawkie (0)Fenrir (0)Uberdogedriver/XnadrojX (0)Bored6886 (0)The Great Gatsby/RADicate (0)
Not Voting (9) @chatterseel Hawkie Fenrir ZestOfLife RADicate Bomb Moss Champ1604 Crespo BoredGames
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2017 22:21:31 GMT
Nice. So now I'm confirmed. For now, I'm going to lynch Kind Kangaroo Killer/ZOL to pressure him to talk. (At least notify us if you need a sub please.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Hawkie on Aug 2, 2017 22:55:49 GMT
yay something good happened i wasn't a part of
|
|
|
|
Post by Hawkie on Aug 2, 2017 23:17:08 GMT
Zol/xna/toni/broken jukebox all good lynches
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2017 2:37:28 GMT
Reasoning..?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2017 2:37:54 GMT
Just cause you said a lynch is a "good", doesn't mean it is good. Please provide reasoning.
|
|
|
|
Post by Champ1604 on Aug 3, 2017 5:56:57 GMT
You're actually nowhere near clear of being Mafia either, so why bother trying to clear yourself with that? More like because I SR'ed ODM, who turned out to be a mafia. 4. Why Fenrir specifically Champ? Well, shouldn't have said it's just Fenrir. But remember this, that Fenrir was more like leading town d1, and was also the most active poster, and his SRs got attention. And uh Fenrir, I didn't get you. What was the 'rings an alarm' thing? I just wrote the truth. And well, you wrote 'narcissistic'. Just in case you don't know, it means: So um. Check the meaning of words before using them. :) And one thing - I'm seriously sorry. I totally didn't read this line - 'I'm going to turbo a reread to wager the odds of Lyncher vs Cop cseel now.' by Fenrir. The sorry was no sarcasm. But still, where had you 'gone back to re read' in the three three/four posts of cseel? And well, the only reason I read about you supporting cseel was you saying "(their reasoning for the inspect factors into this significantly)". And you told me to react on 'Champ: Basically sheeps the general sentiment here, but there's no read. ' right? So I am sheeping you, right? And I'm still surprised. You want me to have a read on these total lurkers? About XnadrojX, well then yeah right, he didn't even say A THING as to why he is lynching cseel. That's the scummy thing. Besides, two things on that: 1. You brought about the fact that people on PS! and circus (where I have played some forum games before - though mostly was literal lurking - just reading posts) are just totally different and stuff, so take this on you - most people on PS! blindly follow the cop if there's no cc. This IS the sad truth. 2. There's no point in taking time into consideration. This is a forum game, and we don't have a big limitation on time. Take RADicate's post: Nobody ever said to QH, but i have played a total of two other forums games (well two NOCs anyways) and on one of them we have had a couple people just turboed and we wasted valuable discussion time. A person who got inspected as mafia could very well wind up getting suffering that fate. And if im being honest, i thought you were a lot closer to hammer than L-3 (i didnt go back and count). And apparently giving my opinions on what we should be doing is actually useless? By that logic anyone who has ever supported a lynch is scummy and getting behind a lynch is useless. Since this is only L-3 though lynch daddy cosbyThis is similar. No potential reason, besides that they are on 'L-3 and it wouldn't matter if I lynch them'. Except that they posted this late. Or I would rather say, it's as if XnadrojX was just passing by on proboards during that time, and lynched the person, and RADicate was locked in his washroom and opened proboards when they got free after some time, saw the cop claim and that they are on a L-3, so just lynched him. But yet again, though their reason sucked, RADicate HAD a reason, and XnadrojX didn't. So XnadrojX leaning scum. I got a read Fenrir. Congratulate me Fenrir. Oh and I noticed one thing. You're really taking deeper meaning of my words. By saying 'What to do' was 'what to do' and not asking for town's approval. It was to display a state of confusion and if you want to include town here, then it was rather asking for consultation than asking for approval. Also also, the last line about not posting until I post.. woah looks like you took that seriously. It's been 7 hours since day 2.5 has started and you haven't posted yet 0_0. |
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Aug 3, 2017 10:10:41 GMT
Champ1604 is pretty much desperately trying to drive everything up against Fenrir now. Some point are relevant to me here so I'm going to address it. "No potential reason" "They had a reason" "Xnad had no reason" OK this made me puke blood, because it's just coming in such a desperate manner. Firstly, you contradict yourself by saying RAD had no reason but he had a reason, which just makes me go "What?". Nextly, You mentioned me not having a reason, but it's basically the same as RAD. RAD: "He's at L-3 anyways, a Cop got a guilty on him." Me:"Blah Blah unimportant stuff above, also Cop got guilty on him so I'll just plop a vote there". I know RAD's post is in general more focused on the lynching of clc, but really, you calling it scummy for what you did is stretching it much farther than I can fathom. "I got a read" I've got more reads. With better reasoning too. And less desperation for wanting approval for your own decisions. "You're taking the deeper meaning of my words" If you wanted to display a state of confusion, then outright say it. Being ambiguous doesn't help at all, and Scum does it to make it easier for them to twist their words to the situation. "It's been 7 hours" So why didn't YOU post earlier? Is this anything to complain about? This is just some desperately pulled out fluff to flesh out your post, it serves no purpose but to throw shade at Fenrir, which you have no reason to. I haven't posted in 11 hours, why did YOU not throw shade at me then? Why not all the other lurkers? Why the one guy targetting you gets the shade thrown at? "I SRed ODM" Means jack.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Aug 3, 2017 10:26:48 GMT
Chatter Seel: Cop, what else do I say ZestOfLife: VigilanteVigoroth, consider getting a sub for this guy pls, no reads can be developed on him. ToniTheSadThing: Their content has in general been very..... general. They just post the kinds of things that put them in between the fence, which pings me slightly. There's nothing specifically scummy in their posts I'd like to push however, it's mainly just their posting style that irks me. Slightly Scummy vibes here. Queen Erotica: I've decimated their above post in my previous post, so I'd leave it at there. Mainly don't like their desperation and crumbling under pressure, as seen with Fenrir vs Them earlier. Feeling quite Scummy here. Hawkie: Very dead, if I had to have a read on him, it'd be slight scum for the extreme lack of content, but that could be due to the extreme lack of motivation. Will reread him once he becomes more motivated. Fenrir: Content, Interactions, Reads, everything screams Town about them here. UberDogeDevourer: I wonder. Broken Jukebox: The content about yesterday had few flaws, but I just don't like their infrequency. Can't really complain there though, and I'd say I feel slightly Towny vibes from him. The Great Gatsby: I know I was against their case in Queen Erotica's post, but I feel he's actually Town here. I feel a drive to gamesolve coming here, as seen from him breaking out of tunneling me, and hunting for reads. Only thing I don't like here is the dip in activity, but if it's going to pick up, he's going to be a solid townread. Vote Queen Erotica/A Faithful Champ/Champ1604My vote goes here for now |
|
|
|
Post by Champ1604 on Aug 3, 2017 14:05:02 GMT
Champ1604 is pretty much desperately trying to drive everything up against Fenrir now. Some point are relevant to me here so I'm going to address it. "No potential reason" "They had a reason" "Xnad had no reason" OK this made me puke blood, because it's just coming in such a desperate manner. Firstly, you contradict yourself by saying RAD had no reason but he had a reason, which just makes me go "What?". Nextly, You mentioned me not having a reason, but it's basically the same as RAD. RAD: "He's at L-3 anyways, a Cop got a guilty on him." Me:"Blah Blah unimportant stuff above, also Cop got guilty on him so I'll just plop a vote there". I know RAD's post is in general more focused on the lynching of clc, but really, you calling it scummy for what you did is stretching it much farther than I can fathom. "I got a read" I've got more reads. With better reasoning too. And less desperation for wanting approval for your own decisions. "You're taking the deeper meaning of my words" If you wanted to display a state of confusion, then outright say it. Being ambiguous doesn't help at all, and Scum does it to make it easier for them to twist their words to the situation. "It's been 7 hours" So why didn't YOU post earlier? Is this anything to complain about? This is just some desperately pulled out fluff to flesh out your post, it serves no purpose but to throw shade at Fenrir, which you have no reason to. I haven't posted in 11 hours, why did YOU not throw shade at me then? Why not all the other lurkers? Why the one guy targetting you gets the shade thrown at? "I SRed ODM" Means jack. Oh well. This sucks - the only thing which is worth replying and original is the first one, others are literally shit and/or unoriginal. But I would still reply to them, because I'm anyways going to sleep in some time, and a have a slight fever so I may be more inactive. So, what you exactly said: What it meant (or I concluded): Firstly, from now on, I will call you XrailX (this is liar btw). I actually laughed to see that you're lying to a post just above you. Okay okay, laughing aside, when did I ever say RAD didn't have any reason? You shouldn't lie, XrailX. Then then, RAD and you have the same reason? You're quite funny. Or wait, I am probably blind or proboards is bugged. I mean, I can't see your reasons. Image: Oh oh wait, the reasons were obvious? Sorry sorry, I mean, I consider non-existent things to be non-existent. But still, you tried to apply some sort of game meta and gave a reason for the lynch. And then you say I can't lynch RAD. OMG YOU ARE ACTUALLY FUNNY You just became my #5th favorite player. Talk about contradictory (oh wait, even you mentioned a lie about the contradictory in my post, illuminati confirmed), you first say that RAD just said about L-3 and lynched ironic, and then you say that I can't SR RAD. Or by this, did you mean that I can't lynch RAD? What, do I need your permission or anything? Going ahead to the useless and/or unoriginal posts you made, You have reads? Congratulations. With better reasoning? XrailX is the perfect name. And the most original (sarcasm intended) post - " And less desperation for wanting approval for your own decisions." Wanting approval, can you not state Fenrir's points and worse, say that without any reason? You read my older post, right? Wanting approval? What shit are you giving me? "Be straightforward with your words" "Because Scum does it to make it easier for them to twist their words to the situation" Just what sort of scum do you play as? Forget that, as I stated, I just react how I would have reacted (most probably even in real life). Or you would have wanted me to say "I'm in a confused state."? About the comment on 7 hours, you frickin' didn't get the point why I put it there? Like you complain that I did that to put shade on Fenrir and I didn't put shade on you, your point being? Yeah, it was used in a context to show that their townread is literally doing the same thing and the reason why Fenrir was on you because you said almost the same thing, but just that there was a time difference. And are you begging me to SR and attack you, and not Fenrir? And SR the lurkers? That applies to you, your townreads, your scumreads and literally everyone playing. XnadrojX, what the heck is your point? And I SR'ed ODM means jack yeah, everything will mean jack when you take a phrase out of a line which had a different meaning of it's own. And I google'd the meaning of jack to know what you exactly mean, but no meaning did fit, except one. The meaning could be XnadrojX, or I should say, XrailX. |
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 3, 2017 14:46:28 GMT
Woo, here I am on a computer for a bit. Gonna hold my lynch tbh, cosby already has plurality right now, no reason to qh. To qh? Who ever said to qh at l-3?... Real cop should cc if there is another cop claim to be had here. Probably afk But if no cop claim does come i'll lynch cosby near the DL. Literally that's like saying I'll just ride this lynch through (what is the point of lynching me near the fucking DL) A lyncher win doesnt even neccesarily equate to a town loss (granted it def doesnt help us but... the pros outwiegh the cons here imo), and if no cc odds of this being the actual cop are pretty high. So im confortable with this lynch, unless we get a legitimate believable cop cc Nice and useless quote right here rad --> scumlean Pretty sure the wifom starts here and I'm probably going to just disregard this entirely when I go back to look at clc's intereactions. I was planning on pushing Zest from the beginning but decided to sidetrack and lynch toni for a bit in the hopes of waking them up I think a lot of champ's content is original enough that I'll stray away from him for now. ZOL is my firmest scumread at this point but if we're confident cseel isn't Lyncher I'll happily lynch scum. Makes sense I guess, but Toni never did wake up. Original content doesn't on its own indicate town. It's been a while since I wrote out my reads in a list, which I plan to do once I've gone through everything that's been posted and clc interactions. It usually helps me gather my thoughts as much as it helps others wondering what I'm thinking. Re: cseel being Lyncher/not Lyncher, idk exactly what it is but there's something I don't like about the last bit, kind of like, "You could decide that for yourself." But you did decide it for yourself earlier, so maybe it's just a personal thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 3, 2017 14:52:01 GMT
Zol/xna/toni/broken jukebox all good lynches Just cause you said a lynch is a "good", doesn't mean it is good. Please provide reasoning. Seconded; you've mentioned ZoL being your biggest scumread but other than that it's "the lurkers minus Champ and Rad." |
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 3, 2017 15:11:24 GMT
You're actually nowhere near clear of being Mafia either, so why bother trying to clear yourself with that? More like because I SR'ed ODM, who turned out to be a mafia. 4. Why Fenrir specifically Champ? Well, shouldn't have said it's just Fenrir. But remember this, that Fenrir was more like leading town d1, and was also the most active poster, and his SRs got attention. And uh Fenrir, I didn't get you. What was the 'rings an alarm' thing? I just wrote the truth. And well, you wrote 'narcissistic'. Just in case you don't know, it means: So um. Check the meaning of words before using them.  And one thing - I'm seriously sorry. I totally didn't read this line - 'I'm going to turbo a reread to wager the odds of Lyncher vs Cop cseel now.' by Fenrir. The sorry was no sarcasm. But still, where had you 'gone back to re read' in the three three/four posts of cseel? And well, the only reason I read about you supporting cseel was you saying "(their reasoning for the inspect factors into this significantly)". And you told me to react on 'Champ: Basically sheeps the general sentiment here, but there's no read. ' right? So I am sheeping you, right? And I'm still surprised. You want me to have a read on these total lurkers? About XnadrojX, well then yeah right, he didn't even say A THING as to why he is lynching cseel. That's the scummy thing. Besides, two things on that: 1. You brought about the fact that people on PS! and circus (where I have played some forum games before - though mostly was literal lurking - just reading posts) are just totally different and stuff, so take this on you - most people on PS! blindly follow the cop if there's no cc. This IS the sad truth. 2. There's no point in taking time into consideration. This is a forum game, and we don't have a big limitation on time. Take RADicate's post: Nobody ever said to QH, but i have played a total of two other forums games (well two NOCs anyways) and on one of them we have had a couple people just turboed and we wasted valuable discussion time. A person who got inspected as mafia could very well wind up getting suffering that fate. And if im being honest, i thought you were a lot closer to hammer than L-3 (i didnt go back and count). And apparently giving my opinions on what we should be doing is actually useless? By that logic anyone who has ever supported a lynch is scummy and getting behind a lynch is useless. Since this is only L-3 though lynch daddy cosbyThis is similar. No potential reason, besides that they are on 'L-3 and it wouldn't matter if I lynch them'. Except that they posted this late. Or I would rather say, it's as if XnadrojX was just passing by on proboards during that time, and lynched the person, and RADicate was locked in his washroom and opened proboards when they got free after some time, saw the cop claim and that they are on a L-3, so just lynched him. But yet again, though their reason sucked, RADicate HAD a reason, and XnadrojX didn't. So XnadrojX leaning scum. I got a read Fenrir. Congratulate me Fenrir. Oh and I noticed one thing. You're really taking deeper meaning of my words. By saying 'What to do' was 'what to do' and not asking for town's approval. It was to display a state of confusion and if you want to include town here, then it was rather asking for consultation than asking for approval. Also also, the last line about not posting until I post.. woah looks like you took that seriously. It's been 7 hours since day 2.5 has started and you haven't posted yet 0_0. Hnng it's so much easier to bold in the quote...I reached (10.2) in this thing. How do you people do this? (1) Good for you, you scumread mafia. you barely pushed them until it was to push them as a scumteam with me, ended up not actually voting for them, and the fact that you're claiming that of all things makes you clear of being mafia honestly makes you even more likely to be mafia. (2) "Rings an alarm" is the same as "red flag" is the same as "pings." Honestly, I think you're just pretending not to know so you don't have to respond to stuff but that's minor. (3) Glad you know the definition and thus know what I mean. Nice filler. (4) Cseel's reasoning for the inspect very much did factor in for me; and what I was primarily reading back for was anything that would indicate someone pushing an agenda, which I didn't find. (5) You're either not reading posts in their entirety or you're taking things out of context, and both are scummy. That entire post is about ODM's reads on people. (6) Your own 1. has nothing to do with the game save the mention of follow the cop; and in this scenario I don't see a problem with it. In something like *cough* a 3v4 LyLo with a Compulsive Vigilante *cough* maybe, but here the cop should and would have cc'ed. With Cops generally wanting so soft inspects, it became super unlikely that one of the people not posting was in fact the cop, and if they are they're now going to have to deal with "Why didn't you pay attention/Why didn't you cc" when and if they do claim. (7) I'd call 3 days a big limitation on time. (8) Oh, look, a read. Let me lavish you with praise for this read based on one thing as opposed to the 27 existing pages of content, on one person as opposed to everyone in the game. That's reads on what, two living people now? And your first one not exclusively based on your read of me? (9) "By saying 'What to do' was 'what to do' and not asking for town's approval. It was to display a state of confusion and if you want to include town here, then it was rather asking for consultation than asking for approval." Just say, "I'm confused" instead of making it vague. I also want you to go into your own definitions of consultation and approval (without consulting the dictionary  ) because as far as I'm concerned your lack of actually voting for anyone in the end makes the two synonymous in this context. (10) "Also also, the last line about not posting until I post.. woah looks like you took that seriously. It's been 7 hours since day 2.5 has started and you haven't posted yet 0_0." I can't tell if this is meant to be a joke or not, but (10.1) I also said that wouldn't be helpful and (10.2) here I am. |
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 3, 2017 15:14:01 GMT
Champ1604 is pretty much desperately trying to drive everything up against Fenrir now. Some point are relevant to me here so I'm going to address it. "No potential reason" "They had a reason" "Xnad had no reason" OK this made me puke blood, because it's just coming in such a desperate manner. Firstly, you contradict yourself by saying RAD had no reason but he had a reason, which just makes me go "What?". Nextly, You mentioned me not having a reason, but it's basically the same as RAD. RAD: "He's at L-3 anyways, a Cop got a guilty on him." Me:"Blah Blah unimportant stuff above, also Cop got guilty on him so I'll just plop a vote there". I know RAD's post is in general more focused on the lynching of clc, but really, you calling it scummy for what you did is stretching it much farther than I can fathom. "I got a read" I've got more reads. With better reasoning too. And less desperation for wanting approval for your own decisions. "You're taking the deeper meaning of my words" If you wanted to display a state of confusion, then outright say it. Being ambiguous doesn't help at all, and Scum does it to make it easier for them to twist their words to the situation. "It's been 7 hours" So why didn't YOU post earlier? Is this anything to complain about? This is just some desperately pulled out fluff to flesh out your post, it serves no purpose but to throw shade at Fenrir, which you have no reason to. I haven't posted in 11 hours, why did YOU not throw shade at me then? Why not all the other lurkers? Why the one guy targetting you gets the shade thrown at? "I SRed ODM" Means jack. Look who took words out of my mouth. |
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Aug 3, 2017 15:23:15 GMT
Responding to the larger post by Champ above.
(1) "This sucks - the only thing which is worth replying and original is the first one, others are literally shit and/or unoriginal." Way to continue the trend of brushing aside concerns brought up about you.
(2) Actually, trying to sort through this and find what isn't a discredit or omgus is nearly impossible.
(3) "What, do I need your permission or anything?" Evidently you don't do anything without permission.
(4) "And are you begging me to SR and attack you, and not Fenrir? And SR the lurkers? That applies to you, your townreads, your scumreads and literally everyone playing. XnadrojX, what the heck is your point?" Rephrased: "I don't scumread you, stop pressuring me or else I will."
(5) "And I SR'ed ODM means jack yeah, everything will mean jack when you take a phrase out of a line which had a different meaning of it's own." Well the line was quite literally just:
so I'd agree it means jack.
(6) "And I google'd the meaning of jack to know what you exactly mean, but no meaning did fit, except one." You may want to keep a dictionary by your side if you have to look up words so often, but pretending you don't know what it means is a piss-poor effort to say "I don't understand it so it's invalid."
I'm almost certainly voting Champ today, but I'll hold off until I can read through clc.
|
|
Pikachu is my God.
) because as far as I'm concerned your lack of actually voting for anyone in the end makes the two synonymous in this context.