|
|
Post by Durza on Dec 21, 2017 20:03:48 GMT
confirming
|
|
|
|
Post by Fenrir on Dec 21, 2017 23:24:49 GMT
Day 1 Commence!
Votecount 1.0
******************************
ForgotToFlush(0)-
cseel(0)-
Agent Orange(0)-
Bomb Moss(0)-
Champ∞1604 (0)-
Thunder~BALLZ(0)-
VigilanteVigoroth(0)-
ajhockeystar(0)-
ScorrchingTheaph(0)-
Bitcoin Baby(0)-
B~a~d~P~e~r~s~o~n(0)-
Not Voting(11)- ForgotToFlush , @howdoitagyou , Durza , @xnadroojx, Champ1604 , qtball , VigilanteVigoroth , ajhockeystar , ScorrchingTheaph , Citrus Freak , Crespo ******************************There are 11 alive so it takes 6 to hammer. Plurality applies. Deadline is Sunday the 24th at 7pm EST.
|
|
|
|
Post by ScorrchingTheaph on Dec 21, 2017 23:26:42 GMT
first
lynch ajhockeystar
|
|
|
|
Post by ajhockeystar on Dec 21, 2017 23:29:40 GMT
fenrir is a badly host, the game is still in signups according to the title :^)
he is also a badly host because he stole my votecount style, get your own bub :^)
alright, scum buddies please reveal yourselves, we need to work out a plan pls and ty
lynch VigilanteVigoroth
hi pash
|
|
|
|
Post by qtball on Dec 21, 2017 23:46:48 GMT
**lynch VigilanteVigoroth** shift off my scum partner / best RO
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2017 23:50:18 GMT
woop woop H Y P E!
Anyways, I think we should do the tactic like we did in PSAnon where we all voted/gave input on who we thought the CV (Compulsive Vigilante) should shoot, as they are, well, compulsive and/or especially since they might not know who to shoot, but of course the CV always gets the final say.
Another option that could work is having a 'second lynch', where we all vote for someone to be shot, but then scum could sway that easier imo (but, then again they don't know who each other are so it could work).
Which one do you guys want to do? I don't think letting the CV roam free is a good idea since Ed PTSD they might shoot some universal (or near-universal) townread cough Lila or might've missed something/misinterpreted something about someone, etc.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2017 23:51:23 GMT
Lynch Bad Person
Bad as in scum-bad or bad in general? Either way, we don't need bad people in this town.
|
|
|
|
Post by ForgotToFlush on Dec 21, 2017 23:56:25 GMT
Support the idea of pre determining a vig shot, more later
|
|
|
|
Post by ForgotToFlush on Dec 22, 2017 2:27:19 GMT
On further inspection it looks like the idea is to just blitz theme as fast as possible so uh
lynch Toni
Speed is the name of the game
|
|
|
|
Post by Champ1604 on Dec 22, 2017 5:49:28 GMT
Good afternoon. The fact is that proboards does not number post, and I don't like 'quoting' posts, so I'm just going to name every post. Oh well. Post #39715 (cseel's first post): This post tilts slightly like town, despite of the fact this could be highly NAI. Of course, this is day one and none of my reads are firm, but this just makes my words clear of the fact that I'm not wanting a cseel lynch as of day one. Either ways, here's my reply on your plan: I have no clue as to how the anon game went, but I'm affirmative about the fact discussing a shot can be extremely helpful early game, but any such discussion late in the game can lightly drown us, since it outs who the CV can be. But however, I'm all ups for the discussion of shot already. Other than that, to stir up some discussion already, here's a WIFOM question - Assume that you are Traitor OS-Vigilante, and you are pretty confident as to who you think the Compulsive Vigilante is. Will you somehow signal in the chat for your Traitor Roleblocker to securely roleblock them, or will you shoot them? Keep in mind that you can as OS-Vigilante at any given point never be a 100% sure that you are correct about the Compulsive Vigilante's identity, and that shooting them will let you lose your shoot - thus making your whole team vulnerable to CV in the case of Traitor Roleblocker being lynched. |
|
|
|
Post by Champ1604 on Dec 22, 2017 6:36:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Dec 22, 2017 6:52:11 GMT
obligatory filler post
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Dec 22, 2017 6:52:48 GMT
Vote Thunder BALLZ
obligatory RVS
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Dec 22, 2017 6:57:12 GMT
On the actual stuff, I'm just going to take a leaf out of MS' book and try something here with the vig shots. I fully agree using the vig like a second lynch because why the hell not and the vig has no reason to not listen to us so...
we can use the standard voting system i.e
[b]Vote PLAYER/Lynch PLAYER[/b]
and then we can have another voting system for the vig shot i.e
[b]Offer PLAYER as Sacrifice/Shoot PLAYER/Paint a target on PLAYER/Whatever as long as it's obvious on PLAYER[/b]
And someone (probably me but someone else can take the job if they're masochists/looking for free towncred) would keep track of the second system unless Fenrir can be coerced or bribed convinced to help us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Dec 22, 2017 7:00:51 GMT
Paint a Target on ForgotToFlush
obligatory RVS? or RSS? /shrug
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Dec 22, 2017 7:17:50 GMT
Shotcount 1.0
!? ForgotToFlush (0) - {XnadrojX} L-5
Not Voting (10) - {ForgotToFlush, cseel, Durza, XnadrojX, Champ1604, Thunder~BALLZ, VigilanteVigoroth, ajhockeystar, ScorrchingTheaph, Citrus Freak, My Little Toni}
There are 11 alive so it takes 6 to hammer. Plurality applies.
Legend:
! PLAYER - WAGON <---- Biggest wagon with plurality on it
? PLAYER - WAGON <---- Biggest counterwagon (without plurality)
!? PLAYER - WAGON <--- Biggest wagon with no counterwagon
|
|
|
|
Post by Champ1604 on Dec 22, 2017 7:45:25 GMT
XnadrojX what are you doing?
|
|
|
|
Post by ForgotToFlush on Dec 22, 2017 8:03:26 GMT
On the actual stuff, I'm just going to take a leaf out of MS' book and try something here with the vig shots. I fully agree using the vig like a second lynch because why the hell not and the vig has no reason to not listen to us so... we can use the standard voting system i.e [b]Vote PLAYER/Lynch PLAYER[/b]and then we can have another voting system for the vig shot i.e [b]Offer PLAYER as Sacrifice/Shoot PLAYER/Paint a target on PLAYER/Whatever as long as it's obvious on PLAYER[/b]
And someone (probably me but someone else can take the job if they're masochists/looking for free towncred) would keep track of the second system unless Fenrir can be coerced or bribed convinced to help us. XnadrojX what are you doing?
Semi unnecessary but w/e
Everyone just offering a statement about a preferred vig shot would work just as well. |
|
|
|
Post by ForgotToFlush on Dec 22, 2017 8:09:02 GMT
oh and I still stand by what I said, in that speed is prob the key to winning here. Like I don't mind mid day hammers for this game at all. Leaves less room for second guessing and what not
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Dec 22, 2017 10:56:09 GMT
lET me do mY sHit in PeAcE
also lolno second guessing happens in every mafia game speed helps us nothing here
|
|
|
|
Post by Bomb Moss on Dec 22, 2017 10:56:55 GMT
It's only that PSAnon game that makes you paranoid.
|
|
|
|
Post by ScorrchingTheaph on Dec 23, 2017 0:12:48 GMT
speed is indeed the name of the game. lets TURBO unlynch ajhockeystar
lynch toniChamp1604 Assume that you are Traitor OS-Vigilante, and you are pretty confident as to who you think the Compulsive Vigilante is. Will you somehow signal in the chat for your Traitor Roleblocker to securely roleblock them, or will you shoot them? Your theoretical wifom question achieves nothing, but I would shoot because I wouldn't want to risk having a signal seen or having a partner miss my signal. |
|
|
|
Post by ForgotToFlush on Dec 23, 2017 0:23:14 GMT
Good afternoon. The fact is that proboards does not number post, and I don't like 'quoting' posts, so I'm just going to name every post. Oh well. Post #39715 (cseel's first post): This post tilts slightly like town, despite of the fact this could be highly NAI. Of course, this is day one and none of my reads are firm, but this just makes my words clear of the fact that I'm not wanting a cseel lynch as of day one. Either ways, here's my reply on your plan: I have no clue as to how the anon game went, but I'm affirmative about the fact discussing a shot can be extremely helpful early game, but any such discussion late in the game can lightly drown us, since it outs who the CV can be. But however, I'm all ups for the discussion of shot already. Other than that, to stir up some discussion already, here's a WIFOM question - Assume that you are Traitor OS-Vigilante, and you are pretty confident as to who you think the Compulsive Vigilante is. Will you somehow signal in the chat for your Traitor Roleblocker to securely roleblock them, or will you shoot them? Keep in mind that you can as OS-Vigilante at any given point never be a 100% sure that you are correct about the Compulsive Vigilante's identity, and that shooting them will let you lose your shoot - thus making your whole team vulnerable to CV in the case of Traitor Roleblocker being lynched.
You're going to completely eliminate the idea of a seel lynch based off that post alone?
Scorch the wifom meta is Megan trying to establish more fuckin playermeta, if it wasn't apparent enough. She's trying to take the easy way out. |
|
|
|
Post by ForgotToFlush on Dec 23, 2017 0:24:14 GMT
also Fenrir lynches?
I didn't read the second page at all so I never saw that two are already on VigVig, so there might be some interesting stuff if either wagon flips
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2017 3:10:37 GMT
Good afternoon. The fact is that proboards does not number post, and I don't like 'quoting' posts, so I'm just going to name every post. Oh well. Post #39715 (cseel's first post): This post tilts slightly like town, despite of the fact this could be highly NAI. Of course, this is day one and none of my reads are firm, but this just makes my words clear of the fact that I'm not wanting a cseel lynch as of day one. Either ways, here's my reply on your plan: I have no clue as to how the anon game went, but I'm affirmative about the fact discussing a shot can be extremely helpful early game, but any such discussion late in the game can lightly drown us, since it outs who the CV can be. But however, I'm all ups for the discussion of shot already. Honestly, I don't think you should be calling that post town, especially since a) it could definitely NAI and b) it's a tactic that was used in Anon (so it isn't my idea). I agree that discussing a shot will be good early game and you made a great point on how it can screw the CV later game. The 'second lynch' system that Xnad is running, I'm not really a fan of, mainly because a) it doesn't give the CV any other options/his or her their own opinion, b) Scum can sway the votes later on and c) they might really disagree with the "lynch" and shoot someone else, which will out them.Other than that, to stir up some discussion already, here's a WIFOM question - Assume that you are Traitor OS-Vigilante, and you are pretty confident as to who you think the Compulsive Vigilante is. Will you somehow signal in the chat for your Traitor Roleblocker to securely roleblock them, or will you shoot them? Keep in mind that you can as OS-Vigilante at any given point never be a 100% sure that you are correct about the Compulsive Vigilante's identity, and that shooting them will let you lose your shoot - thus making your whole team vulnerable to CV in the case of Traitor Roleblocker being lynched. So, I'm gonna make a list of pros and cons of just discussing and having a second lynch. (feel free to add stuff to the list) Pros of discussing a shot and not a second lynch: Will give the Compulsive Vigilante some opinion and they will have the final say, scum cannot sway opinions as easily and pretty safe in getting the majority's opinion. Cons of discussing a shot and not a second lynch: Likely will make Compulsive Vigilante-hunting easier for the Traitor Roleblocker and the Traitor OS Vig, CV might have an entirely different opinion on a read and shoot someone most people townread/slighly townread. Pros of a second lynch and not just discussing a shot: Psychologically, I think people will focus on reads for the second lynch more than just discussion, it'll be easier to see/find the majority's opinion -> the universally scummiest people will definitely die, it'll be harder for scum to find the CV as it's just shooting the person that majority of the people voted for and interactions will be easier to read. Cons of a second lynch and not just discussing a shot: CV doesn't really get a final say, because otherwise they'll out themselves -> different scumreads and if scum inspects each other, then they can possibly sway the votes. From this, I think we should do the Second Lynch idea, but there's definitely things I missed, so feel free to add things. |
|
